CVE-2025-58145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] There are two issues related to the mapping of pages belonging to other domains: For one, an assertion is wrong there, where the case actually needs handling. A NULL pointer de-reference could result on a release build. This is CVE-2025-58144. And then the P2M lock isn't held until a page reference was actually obtained (or the attempt to do so has failed). Otherwise the page can not only change type, but even ownership in between, thus allowing domain boundaries to be violated. This is CVE-2025-58145.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Xen's P2M (Physical to Machine) mapping code, the lock protecting page table entries is released before a page reference is actually obtained. This race condition allows pages to change type or ownership between lock release and reference capture, enabling domain boundary violations where one VM can potentially access another VM's memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.12.0, < 4.17.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Xen hypervisor is installedCheck for Xen installation by examining /proc/xen/version, running 'xl version' or 'xm version', or checking if the xen kernel module is loaded with 'lsmod | grep xen'Affected if The system is not running Xen hypervisor - this CVE does not apply to other hypervisors or bare metal
-
Identify the running Xen versionExecute 'xl version' or 'xm version' to obtain the Xen hypervisor version number. Alternatively, check 'dmesg | grep -i xen' for version information logged at boot.Affected if Unable to determine the Xen version - cannot assess CVE applicability
-
Compare installed version against affected rangeCompare the identified Xen version to the affected range: >= 4.12.0 and < 4.17.0. Note that versions 4.12.0 through 4.16.x inclusive are affected.Affected if The installed Xen version falls within the range >= 4.12.0 and < 4.17.0 (versions 4.12.0 through 4.16.x)
-
Confirm P2M functionality is in useThis is implicit in any Xen installation - the P2M (Physical to Machine) mapping code is core to how Xen virtualizes memory for all guests. No additional check needed.Affected if The environment uses Xen for virtualization (P2M code is always active)
The environment is affected if the system runs Xen hypervisor version 4.12.0 through 4.16.x, as the race condition in the P2M lock exists in these versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.17.0
Apply the Xen security patch for CVE-2025-58145 to ensure the P2M lock is held until page references are actually obtained, preventing domain isolation bypass.
Xen 4.17.0 or later stable release
- Identify current Xen version using 'xl version' or 'xm version' command
- Schedule a maintenance window for the hypervisor update
- Upgrade Xen to version 4.17.0 or later stable release using your distribution's package manager or from xenbits.xenproject.org
- Reboot the host(s) to load the updated hypervisor
- Verify the new version is running with 'xl version' and confirm it shows 4.17.0 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data