CVE-2025-58224
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Printeers Printeers Print & Ship allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Printeers Print & Ship: from n/a through 1.17.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Printeers Print & Ship allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended actions. The vulnerability exists due to missing or insufficient CSRF protections, enabling malicious requests to be crafted that the victim's browser will automatically send with their session credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionLocate the Printeers Print & Ship installation directory or admin panel and retrieve the software version number from the About page, footer, or version fileAffected if The installed version matches any vulnerable release of Printeers Print & Ship
-
Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF tokensNavigate to forms that perform actions like login, checkout, address changes, or account updates. View the page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for a CSRF token input field (commonly named 'csrf_token', 'token', 'csrf', '_token', or similar) in each formAffected if Any state-changing form is missing a CSRF token parameter
-
Verify token is validated server-sideSubmit a state-changing request without the CSRF token (using a tool like Burp Suite or by modifying the request) and observe if the action is rejectedAffected if The application accepts the request without a valid CSRF token, indicating missing server-side validation
-
Check SameSite cookie attributeLog into the application, open browser Developer Tools (F12), go to the Application or Storage tab, expand Cookies, select the domain, and inspect the session cookie. Look for the SameSite attribute in the cookie detailsAffected if Session cookies do not have the SameSite attribute set to 'Strict' or 'Lax'
-
Check Origin/Referer header validationSend a crafted request with a mismatched or missing Origin or Referer header (using a proxy tool) to a state-changing endpoint and verify if the application rejects itAffected if The application accepts requests with missing or mismatched Origin/Referer headers without rejecting them
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable version of Printeers Print & Ship and the application lacks CSRF tokens on forms, does not validate Origin/Referer headers, or does not set SameSite attributes on session cookies.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers to ensure requests originate from trusted sources. Enable SameSite attribute on session cookies.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58224 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58224 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data