CVE-2025-58250
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ApusTheme Findgo fingo allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Findgo: from n/a through <= 1.3.55.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the ApusTheme Findgo WordPress theme allows authentication bypass. An attacker can craft malicious requests that trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions (potentially including account takeover) without their consent, due to missing or insufficient anti-CSRF token validation on sensitive operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Findgo theme is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Appearance > Themes and verify the Findgo theme by ApusTheme is installed and activeAffected if Findgo theme is installed and active on the WordPress site
-
Identify Findgo theme versionIn the Themes panel, click on the Findgo theme details to view the version number. Compare this to any official advisory version informationAffected if The installed version matches the affected version range listed in CVE advisory
-
Inspect theme for nonce implementationAccess the theme files via FTP or file manager. Examine PHP files in the theme directory (particularly in /inc, /functions, or plugin files) for wp_nonce_field() or wp_verify_nonce() calls in form handlers. Search for state-changing actions like user profile updates, settings changes, or authentication-related functionsAffected if No nonce verification (wp_verify_nonce, check_admin_referer) is found in form handling code for sensitive operations
-
Test for CSRF vulnerabilityWith a browser, log in as a test user. Create a malicious HTML page on another domain that submits a request to the Findgo theme's form endpoints (e.g., profile update, settings). Attempt to trigger this from an unauthenticated context to see if the request is processed without CSRF tokenAffected if Requests to sensitive theme functions succeed without valid CSRF token or Referer/Origin validation
The site is affected if the Findgo theme is active and the theme code lacks proper nonce validation on forms handling sensitive operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing forms and validate the nonce in corresponding form handlers. Additionally, enforce Origin/Referer header validation as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58250 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58250 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data