CVE-2025-58259
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in scriptsbundle Nokri nokri allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Nokri: from n/a through <= 1.6.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Nokri theme (version 1.6.4 and below) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions by forging requests. The lack of proper anti-CSRF token validation on state-changing operations enables malicious actors to execute commands on behalf of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Nokri theme versionLocate the theme version information in the Nokri theme files, typically found in style.css header comments or within the theme documentation/options panel. Compare the installed version against 1.6.4.Affected if The installed Nokri theme version is 1.6.4 or lower.
-
Identify state-changing endpointsReview the Nokri theme for forms and AJAX endpoints that perform user actions such as profile updates, job submissions, messaging, or settings changes. These are typically found in template files and PHP handler files within the theme directory.Affected if The theme contains forms or endpoints that process user-submitted data without page reloads.
-
Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokensView the HTML source of key forms (registration, login, profile edit, job post, contact forms) in the Nokri theme. Check for the presence of a hidden token field (commonly named _wpnonce, csrf_token, or similar) that is submitted with the form.Affected if Forms lack a hidden anti-CSRF token field or the token is not validated server-side.
-
Verify server-side token validationExamine the PHP files that process form submissions for the presence of token validation logic. Look for calls to nonce verification functions or explicit token comparison checks before processing state-changing requests.Affected if Form handler files do not validate the anti-CSRF token before executing the requested action.
-
Check session cookie SameSite attributeInspect the session cookies set by the site when logged in. Use browser developer tools or a network inspector to view cookie headers and verify if the SameSite attribute is set to Lax or Strict.Affected if Session cookies are missing the SameSite attribute or have it set to None without Secure flag.
You are affected if the Nokri theme version is 1.6.4 or below AND state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all forms and state-changing endpoints, validate Origin/Referer headers, and configure SameSite attributes on session cookies.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58259 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58259 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data