CVE-2025-58269
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in weDevs WP Project Manager wedevs-project-manager allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects WP Project Manager: from n/a through <= 2.6.25.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WP Project Manager plugin by weDevs contains hardcoded credentials embedded in the codebase. This vulnerability allows an attacker to retrieve these embedded sensitive credentials, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data exposure. The issue affects versions up to and including 2.6.25.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Project Manager plugin is installedCheck your WordPress site's wp-content/plugins directory or access the Plugins admin page to confirm the WP Project Manager plugin by weDevs is presentAffected if The plugin is installed and active on the WordPress site
-
Check installed plugin versionAccess the Plugins admin page in WordPress and locate the WP Project Manager plugin to view its installed version number, or inspect the plugin header in its main PHP file for the Version fieldAffected if The installed version is 2.6.25 or lower (any version up to and including 2.6.25)
-
Search plugin source for hardcoded credentialsInspect the plugin source code files in the wp-project-manager directory for embedded strings that resemble credentials such as passwords, API keys, tokens, or secret keys. Look for suspicious static string assignments in PHP filesAffected if Hardcoded credentials (passwords, API keys, tokens, or similar secrets) are found embedded in the plugin source code
A user is affected if the WP Project Manager plugin is installed with version 2.6.25 or lower and contains hardcoded credentials in its source files
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace all hardcoded credentials with secure credential management methods such as environment variables or a secure configuration vault, and rotate any exposed credentials immediately.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58269 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58269 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data