CVE-2025-58468
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect Notification Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: Notification Center 1.10.0.3291 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Notification Center. Attackers can craft malicious requests that trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions, potentially allowing privilege escalation or user identity hijacking. The vulnerability exploits the lack of proper CSRF token validation in the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.10.0, < 1.10.0.3291CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Notification Center applicationLocate the Notification Center software on your system. Check the application name, installed software list, or service details to confirm the product name matches 'Notification Center'Affected if The application is named Notification Center or a variant thereof
-
Find the installed versionAccess the application's 'About' section, check the installation directory for a version file, or use system commands to query the installed software version (e.g., 'Get-ItemProperty' in Windows, RPM query on Linux, or checking the application's runtime information)Affected if The version returned is lower than 1.10.0.3291 or cannot be determined to be 1.10.0.3291 or higher
-
Verify CSRF protection is enabledInspect the application's configuration files or settings panel for CSRF protection options. Look for settings related to 'CSRF token validation', 'request verification', or 'origin validation' in the Notification Center admin or configuration interfaceAffected if CSRF protection is disabled, missing, or not configurable in the application
-
Check for security tokens in POST requestsUse a web proxy or browser developer tools to capture a POST request from the Notification Center. Examine whether the request includes a security token, anti-CSRF token, or CSRF header such as 'X-CSRF-Token' or 'X-XSRF-Token'Affected if POST requests to Notification Center do not include any security token or the token is missing from sensitive actions
You are affected if Notification Center is installed and the version is below 1.10.0.3291 OR if CSRF token validation is not implemented in the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.10.0.3291
Upgrade to Notification Center version 1.10.0.3291 or later, which contains the fix for this CSRF vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not possible, implement anti-CSRF tokens and SameSite cookie attributes as a compensating control.
Notification Center 1.10.0.3291
- 1. Log in to your QNAP NAS as an administrator.
- 2. Navigate to Notification Center in the QNAP interface.
- 3. Check the current version of Notification Center.
- 4. If the installed version is earlier than 1.10.0.3291, update Notification Center to version 1.10.0.3291 or later.
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the version number after the update completes.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58468 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data