CVE-2025-58488
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper verification of source of a communication channel in SmartTouchCall prior to version 1.0.1.1 allows remote attackers to access sensitive information. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSmartTouchCall versions prior to 1.0.1.1 fail to properly verify the source of communication channels, allowing remote attackers to access sensitive information. The vulnerability requires user interaction to trigger, suggesting an attack vector such as malicious links or crafted requests that trick authenticated users into initiating unauthorized data access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SmartTouchCall installationCheck if Samsung Smart Touch Call application is installed on the device. Look for the app in the device's application list or settings.Affected if The application is installed and running on the device.
-
Determine installed versionAccess the app's about/settings section or use system settings to view the installed version of SmartTouchCall. This is typically found under Settings > Apps > Smart Touch Call > Version, or within the app's own menu.Affected if The version cannot be determined or is not visible.
-
Compare version against fixed releaseCompare the identified version number to 1.0.1.1. Note that versions prior to 1.0.1.1 are affected; version 1.0.1.1 and later contain the fix.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.0.1.1 (for example, 1.0.1.0, 1.0.0.x, etc.).
-
Assess user interaction exposureDetermine whether users have access to external links or can initiate communication requests from untrusted sources within the application.Affected if Users can click external links or submit requests without additional verification steps.
A user is affected if SmartTouchCall is installed with a version lower than 1.0.1.1 and users interact with external or untrusted communication channels within the app.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SmartTouchCall to version 1.0.1.1 or later to obtain the fix. Until then, limit user exposure to untrusted links and monitor for unusual access patterns.
1.0.1.1
- Upgrade Smart Touch Call to version 1.0.1.1 or later via the Samsung Galaxy Store or Google Play Store
- Verify the installed version by navigating to Settings > Apps > Smart Touch Call and checking the version number
- Ensure the update is successfully applied before resuming normal use
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58488 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58488 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data