CVE-2025-58582
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIf a user tries to login but the provided credentials are incorrect a log is created. The data for this POST requests is not validated and it’s possible to send giant payloads which are then logged.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe login endpoint accepts POST request data without validation or size limits, allowing attackers to send arbitrarily large payloads that are written to logs. This can cause denial of service through log storage exhaustion or resource consumption during log processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Sick Enterprise Analytics is deployedIdentify the installed application - check web server configuration, installed software inventory, or running services for 'Sick Enterprise Analytics'Affected if The product is Sick Enterprise Analytics and the login endpoint is accessible
-
Locate the login endpointAccess the web interface and navigate to the login page, or examine web server configuration files for login-related routes/endpointsAffected if A login endpoint exists and accepts POST requests
-
Verify logging is enabled for login attemptsCheck application configuration files for logging settings related to authentication/login events; examine log directories for recent login-related entriesAffected if Logging is enabled and login attempts are being recorded to disk
-
Check for POST payload size limitsReview web server (e.g., Apache, Nginx) or application configuration for settings like 'client_max_body_size', 'max_post_size', or equivalent limits on the login endpointAffected if No size limits are configured or limits are set to excessively large values (e.g., unlimited, very high MB)
-
Inspect recent log files for oversized entriesExamine login-related log files for unusually large entries that may indicate the vulnerability is being exploited; check log file sizes and timestampsAffected if Log files contain entries with abnormally large payload data from login POST requests
If Sick Enterprise Analytics is deployed with its login endpoint accessible and logging enabled without enforced POST size limits, the environment is vulnerable to log exhaustion DoS via oversized login payloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and payload size limits on login POST parameters before logging, rejecting oversized requests with appropriate error responses.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58582 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58582 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data