CVE-2025-58628
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in kamleshyadav Miraculous miraculous allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Miraculous: from n/a through < 2.0.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Miraculous application (versions prior to 2.0.9) that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input, potentially enabling data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Miraculous application is installedSearch for Miraculous in your application inventory, web server document roots, or package managers. Look for directories or files named 'miraculous' or associated configuration files.Affected if Miraculous application is present in the environment
-
Determine installed Miraculous versionCheck version files such as version.json, package.json, composer.json, or a VERSION file in the Miraculous installation directory. Also check the application's about page or API endpoint if available.Affected if Version cannot be determined or shows a version prior to 2.0.9
-
Verify vulnerable code paths existSearch source code for SQL query construction that accepts user input without using parameterized queries or prepared statements. Look for patterns like string concatenation with user-supplied data in SQL contexts.Affected if Code contains direct SQL query construction with unsanitized user input
-
Confirm application processes user inputReview application endpoints, forms, or API routes that accept user input and route it to database operations. Check if input validation or sanitization is present.Affected if Application accepts user input that flows to database queries without proper parameterization
Environment is affected if Miraculous version is prior to 2.0.9 and the application processes user-supplied input through database queries without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Miraculous version 2.0.9 or later, and implement parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection in all database interactions.
Miraculous theme version 2.0.9 or later
- 1. Backup your WordPress site and database before proceeding
- 2. Navigate to Appearance > Themes in the WordPress admin dashboard
- 3. Update the Miraculous theme to version 2.0.9 or later
- 4. Verify the update was successful by checking the theme version in WordPress admin
- 5. Test critical functionality on the site to ensure it works correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58628 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58628 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data