CVE-2025-58657
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EdwardBock Grid grid allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Grid: from n/a through <= 2.3.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EdwardBock Grid component versions 2.3.1 and below allows remote attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting malicious requests that inject and persist arbitrary JavaScript code (Stored XSS) into the grid, which then executes when other users view the compromised data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if EdwardBock Grid component is in useSearch your codebase, dependencies, or installed packages for 'edwardbock' or 'grid' component references. Check package.json, requirements.txt, or similar dependency manifests for the EdwardBock Grid library.Affected if The EdwardBock Grid component version 2.3.1 or below is present in your dependencies or codebase.
-
Determine the installed version of EdwardBock GridRun a package manager command to list the installed version, such as npm list edwardbock-grid, pip show edwardbock-grid, or the equivalent for your package manager. Compare the version number to the affected range (2.3.1 and below).Affected if The installed version is 2.3.1 or lower.
-
Inspect grid operations for CSRF protection mechanismsExamine the backend code that handles state-changing Grid operations (add, edit, delete, update). Look for synchronizer token pattern implementation, anti-CSRF token validation, or Origin/Referer header checks on these endpoints.Affected if State-changing Grid operations lack CSRF token validation or Origin/Referer header verification.
-
Check if user input is sanitized before grid renderingReview the grid component code or template that renders user-supplied data. Look for output encoding, input validation, or sanitization functions applied to data before it is displayed in the grid cells.Affected if User-supplied input rendered in the grid is not sanitized or escaped before display, allowing script execution.
You are affected if you have EdwardBock Grid component version 2.3.1 or below installed AND your grid state-changing operations lack CSRF protection AND user input rendered in the grid is not sanitized.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing Grid operations and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent CSRF attacks; sanitize all user-supplied input before rendering in the grid.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58657 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58657 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data