CVE-2025-58685
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in cecabank Cecabank WooCommerce Plugin cecabank-woocommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Cecabank WooCommerce Plugin: from n/a through <= 0.3.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in Cecabank WooCommerce plugin (version <= 0.3.4) allows exploiting incorrectly configured access control security levels. This could permit unauthorized users to access functionality they should not have permission to use, potentially impacting payment processing or administrative functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Cecabank WooCommerce plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and find 'Cecabank WooCommerce' or check the main plugin PHP file header for 'Version' fieldAffected if The displayed version is 0.3.4 or lower
-
Confirm the plugin is activeCheck the WordPress plugins page to verify the Cecabank WooCommerce plugin is enabledAffected if The plugin is installed and active
-
Verify plugin files existNavigate to wp-content/plugins/ directory and confirm the cecabank-woocommerce folder exists with PHP filesAffected if The plugin directory and files are present on the server
-
Check for administrative functions exposureReview the plugin PHP files for functions that handle payment processing, settings, or admin actions without capability checks (look for 'add_action' or 'add_menu_page' without current_user_can validation)Affected if The plugin contains admin functions lacking authorization checks (current_user_can, wp_verify_nonce, etc.)
A user is affected if the Cecabank WooCommerce plugin version is 0.3.4 or lower and the plugin is active, since the missing authorization vulnerability could allow unauthorized access to restricted functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of the plugin once available. Until then, restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only and monitor for suspicious activity.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58685 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58685 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data