Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-58690

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ptibogxiv Doliconnect doliconnect allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Doliconnect: from n/a through <= 9.5.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in Doliconnect allows attackers to craft malicious requests that result in Stored XSS. The lack of anti-CSRF tokens on forms enables attackers to trick authenticated users into submitting requests that inject malicious scripts into the application, which then executes when other users view the stored content.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and endpoints, combined with proper input validation and output encoding to prevent Stored XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Doliconnect installation
    Check for Doliconnect by locating its main PHP files (e.g., doliconnect.php) or the application directory in your webroot. Look for folders named 'doliconnect' or files containing 'doliconnect' in the filename.
    Affected if Doliconnect software is found on the system
  2. Determine installed Doliconnect version
    Locate the version file or check the admin dashboard for the Doliconnect version number. Common locations include a 'version.php' file, a 'readme' file, or the administration panel under 'About' or 'System Info'.
    Affected if The installed version does not include the CVE-2025-58690 fix or the version cannot be determined
  3. Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokens
    View the HTML source of state-changing forms (e.g., forms that submit user input, update settings, or create content). Look for hidden input fields with names like 'csrf_token', 'nonce', 'token', 'csrf', 'xsrf', or similar security token identifiers.
    Affected if Forms lack hidden token fields or the tokens are not validated server-side
  4. Verify token validation server-side
    Review the PHP source code that handles form submissions. Check if the form handler validates the presence and correctness of anti-CSRF tokens before processing any state-changing request.
    Affected if Form handlers do not validate anti-CSRF tokens or skip validation entirely
  5. Test for Stored XSS via CSRF
    Using an authenticated session, submit a form with a test script payload (e.g., <script>alert('XSS')</script>) without any anti-CSRF token. Then navigate to the page where the content is displayed to see if the script executes.
    Affected if The malicious script executes when viewing the stored content, indicating both CSRF and Stored XSS are present

You are affected if Doliconnect is installed and its forms lack anti-CSRF token protection, allowing authenticated users to be tricked into injecting malicious scripts that execute for other users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and endpoints, combined with proper input validation and output encoding to prevent Stored XSS execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58690 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58690 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data