Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-58818

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SwiftNinjaPro Developer Tools Blocker swiftninjapro-inspect-element-console-blocker allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Developer Tools Blocker: from n/a through <= 3.2.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SwiftNinjaPro Developer Tools Blocker plugin for WordPress allows attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions. The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on state-changing operations, likely in admin settings pages or AJAX endpoints.

MitigationImplement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) on all forms and AJAX endpoints, verify nonce validity server-side on every state-changing request, and use SameSite cookie attributes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify plugin is installed
    Check WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder containing 'swiftninjapro' or 'developer-tools-blocker'
    Affected if The plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/ and the plugin is activated in WordPress admin
  2. Identify main plugin file
    Open the plugin directory and locate the primary PHP file (usually named index.php, main.php, or the same as the plugin folder)
    Affected if Plugin files are present in the WordPress installation
  3. Locate admin settings handlers
    Search plugin files for add_action calls targeting admin_menu, admin_init, or settings API hooks - these register the settings pages where state changes occur
    Affected if Plugin has admin settings functionality that processes form submissions
  4. Inspect AJAX endpoint handlers
    Search for wp_ajax_ or wp_ajax_nopriv_ hooks in the plugin code - these handle AJAX requests that may perform state changes
    Affected if Plugin registers AJAX handlers for admin or front-end requests
  5. Check for missing nonce verification
    In settings handlers and AJAX callbacks, search for absence of wp_verify_nonce(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_nonce_field() calls before processing any state-changing logic (options updates, user blocks, etc.)
    Affected if State-changing operations (saving settings, modifying data, performing actions) do not verify a nonce token before executing
  6. Identify exploitable form or AJAX actions
    Look for any HTML forms in admin pages or JavaScript AJAX calls that submit to the plugin's handlers without including a nonce field or token parameter
    Affected if Forms or AJAX requests that trigger state changes do not include anti-CSRF tokens

You are affected if the SwiftNinjaPro Developer Tools Blocker plugin is active and its admin settings pages or AJAX endpoints perform state-changing operations without verifying WordPress nonces.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement WordPress nonces (anti-CSRF tokens) on all forms and AJAX endpoints, verify nonce validity server-side on every state-changing request, and use SameSite cookie attributes.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58818 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data