CVE-2025-58833
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in INVELITY Invelity MyGLS connect invelity-mygls-connect allows Object Injection.This issue affects Invelity MyGLS connect: from n/a through <= 1.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in Invelity MyGLS connect plugin (versions up to 1.1.1) enables attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions that result in object injection. This high-severity (CVSS 8.8) issue stems from missing or inadequate CSRF protections on sensitive endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Invelity MyGLS connect plugin installationCheck your WordPress wp-content/plugins directory for a folder named 'mygls-connect' or similar. You can also list installed plugins via WP-CLI: wp plugin list --search='mygls' or check in WordPress admin under Plugins.Affected if The plugin folder does not exist (not affected). If the folder exists, proceed to version check.
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually mygls-connect.php) and locate the 'Version' header comment in the file, or check the plugin's readme.txt file for the version number.Affected if Version is 1.1.1 or lower, or the version cannot be determined but the plugin is present.
-
Verify presence of CSRF protection in state-changing codeSearch the plugin directory for nonce verification calls. Look for calls to wp_verify_nonce, check_ajax_referer, or nonces in forms. Use grep to search for patterns like 'wp_verify_nonce' or 'check_ajax_referer' in PHP files within the plugin folder.Affected if No nonce verification is found in AJAX handlers or form processing code that handles state-changing operations (orders, shipments, settings).
-
Inspect cookie configuration for SameSite attributeCheck the plugin's initialization code for calls to setcookie or PHP session configuration. Look for SameSite=Lax or SameSite=Strict being set on session cookies, or verify via browser developer tools that cookies set by the plugin have the SameSite attribute.Affected if SameSite attribute is missing from session cookies, or the plugin does not configure cookie security settings.
You are affected if the Invelity MyGLS connect plugin is installed with version 1.1.1 or lower AND the plugin lacks CSRF nonce verification on sensitive endpoints AND lacks SameSite cookie attributes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations, validate origin/referer headers server-side, and set SameSite attributes on session cookies. Update to a patched version when available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58833 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58833 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data