dbcve.org
BizhubApplication · Konicaminolta

CVE-2025-5884

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2025-02-02 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202. This affects an unknown part of the component Display MFP Information List. The manipulation of the argument Model Name leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Display MFP Information List component of Konica Minolta bizhub devices (versions up to 20250202). The Model Name parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing injection of malicious scripts via remote HTTP requests.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the Model Name parameter. Apply context-appropriate escaping when displaying user-supplied data. Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as defense-in-depth.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BizhubApplication
Affected:<= 2025-02-02

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device as a Konica Minolta bizhub
    Access the device web interface or print a configuration page. Look for Konica Minolta branding and 'bizhub' in the model name. Alternatively, query SNMP for the sysDescr or check the device welcome page.
    Affected if The device is confirmed to be a Konica Minolta bizhub model.
  2. Check the firmware version
    In the bizhub web interface, navigate to the Device Information or Utility page. The firmware version is typically displayed as a date (YYYYMMDD format) or a version number. On the control panel, access System Settings > Device Information > Version. Record the firmware date code.
    Affected if The firmware date code is 20250202 or earlier.
  3. Confirm web services are enabled
    Access the bizhub web interface by entering the device IP address in a browser. Verify the login page or public information page loads. Check Web Services settings in the Admin menu.
    Affected if The HTTP web interface is accessible and responds to requests.
  4. Locate the Display MFP Information List feature
    In the bizhub web interface, search for 'MFP Information', 'Device List', or 'Display MFP Information List' under Utility, Device Settings, or Network settings. Note whether this page exists and is accessible.
    Affected if The Display MFP Information List component is present and accessible via the web interface.
  5. Verify if Model Name parameter accepts input
    If the Display MFP Information List page is found, attempt to access it and observe if it displays or accepts a Model Name parameter. Check if the page reflects user-supplied or configured model names in the output.
    Affected if The page exists and displays model information without proper sanitization indicators.

The device is affected if it is a Konica Minolta bizhub with firmware dated 20250202 or earlier and has the web interface with Display MFP Information List component accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2025-02-02
Interim mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the Model Name parameter. Apply context-appropriate escaping when displaying user-supplied data. Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as defense-in-depth.

Fix this in Bizhub Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5884 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5884 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data