Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2025-58841

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in John Luetke Media Author media-author allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Media Author: from n/a through <= 1.0.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Media Author versions 1.0.4 and below contain an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability (CWE-266) that allows authenticated users to escalate their privileges beyond what they should have. The specific mechanism is not detailed, but the CVSS 5.5 indicates a network-exploitable, low-complexity issue requiring low privileges but no user interaction, leading to unauthorized access to administrative or elevated functions.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version if available; otherwise, audit the application's user role and permission assignment logic to identify where improper privileges are being granted and implement proper role-based access controls with explicit authorization checks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Media Author version
    Locate the Media Author application and retrieve its version number from the application interface, about page, or installation metadata. Common locations include the software's main dashboard, help menu, or system information panel.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.4 or any earlier version (e.g., 1.0.3, 1.0.2, 1.0.1, 1.0.0)
  2. Confirm user authentication is active
    Verify that the Media Author application has user accounts and authentication enabled. Check whether users can log in with credentials rather than accessing the application anonymously.
    Affected if User authentication is enabled and users have accounts in the system
  3. Review user role assignments
    Examine the application's user management section to see what roles are assigned to non-administrative users. Look for any users granted elevated permissions beyond their intended role level.
    Affected if Non-administrative user accounts exist with elevated or administrative privileges they should not possess
  4. Audit permission configuration
    Inspect the application's permission or access control settings. Check whether role-based access controls are properly defined and whether authorization checks are enforced on sensitive functions.
    Affected if Permission settings allow authenticated users to access administrative or elevated functions they should not reach

You are affected if Media Author version 1.0.4 or below is installed with user authentication enabled, and non-administrative users can access elevated functions beyond their intended role.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version if available; otherwise, audit the application's user role and permission assignment logic to identify where improper privileges are being granted and implement proper role-based access controls with explicit authorization checks.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58841 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data