Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-58859

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in David Merinas Add to Feedly add-to-feedly allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Add to Feedly: from n/a through <= 1.2.11.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Add to Feedly WordPress plugin (versions <= 1.2.11) allows authenticated administrators to be tricked into submitting malicious requests that inject stored XSS payloads into the plugin, potentially affecting all users who view the injected content.

MitigationUpdate to a patched version of the plugin; if unavailable, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Implementing anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing forms and actions, plus proper output sanitization, is required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Add to Feedly plugin is installed
    Access your WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Add to Feedly' in the list of active plugins.
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list and is activated.
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In the Plugins list, click on the plugin name or view details to find the version number displayed. Compare this to the affected range of versions <= 1.2.11.
    Affected if The displayed version number is 1.2.11 or lower.
  3. Verify if admin forms lack CSRF protection
    Inspect the plugin PHP files in /wp-content/plugins/add-to-feedly/ (or similar path). Look for admin form handlers and check if they verify nonces using functions like wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer.
    Affected if State-changing admin actions (such as saving plugin settings) do not validate CSRF tokens.
  4. Inspect plugin settings for suspicious stored content
    Navigate to the plugin settings page in WordPress admin. Check all input fields for unexpected JavaScript tags, event handlers, or encoded payloads that could indicate XSS injection.
    Affected if The plugin settings database entries or displayed options contain unsanitized script tags or HTML event attributes.

Your environment is affected if the Add to Feedly plugin is installed with version 1.2.11 or lower, and the plugin lacks CSRF nonce validation on its admin forms or contains stored XSS in its settings.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to a patched version of the plugin; if unavailable, disable the plugin until a fix is released. Implementing anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing forms and actions, plus proper output sanitization, is required.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

1.2.12 or latest available version

  1. 1. Log in to your WordPress admin dashboard
  2. 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. 3. Find the 'Add to Feedly' plugin
  4. 4. Check if an update is available. If so, update to the latest version (likely 1.2.12 or higher)
  5. 5. If no update is available through the WordPress admin, download the latest version from the official WordPress plugin repository or contact the plugin developer
  6. 6. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly on your site

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58859 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58859 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data