FrameWordPress extension · Ancorathemes

CVE-2025-58899

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.4.0 or later.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in AncoraThemes Frame frame allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Frame: from n/a through <= 2.4.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in AncoraThemes Frame theme <= 2.4.0 allows attackers to include arbitrary local files via improper control of filename parameters in PHP include/require statements. This can enable unauthorized reading of sensitive server files such as configuration files, credentials, or system files.

MitigationUpgrade to the latest version of the Frame theme which contains proper input validation on include/require statements. If no update is available, implement strict whitelist-based validation on all user-controlled file path parameters and disable allow_url_include in PHP configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FrameWordPress extension
Affected:<= 2.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the installed Frame theme version
    Check the theme's style.css file (usually in /wp-content/themes/frame/) for the 'Version:' header, or look for a version constant in functions.php or theme.json
    Affected if The version listed is 2.4.0 or lower
  2. Identify PHP files with dynamic include/require statements
    Search theme files (particularly in the root and includes/ folders) for patterns like 'include($_GET[', 'require($_POST[', 'include($' followed by any variable that could be user-controlled
    Affected if Dynamic include/require statements using variables that could be influenced by user input exist in accessible PHP files
  3. Determine web accessibility of vulnerable includes
    Check if the identified PHP files containing dynamic includes/requires are directly accessible via HTTP (not blocked by .htaccess or WordPress routing)
    Affected if The PHP files with dynamic includes are reachable via web requests without authentication
  4. Inspect PHP configuration for dangerous settings
    Check phpinfo() or php.ini for allow_url_include = 1 (allows remote file inclusion, amplifying LFI impact)
    Affected if allow_url_include is enabled, increasing the severity of any LFI vulnerability
  5. Review web server logs for LFI exploitation attempts
    Search access logs for patterns like '../', '..\', '/etc/passwd', 'wp-config.php' in URL parameters, especially targeting theme PHP files
    Affected if Recent or historical requests contain path traversal patterns targeting theme files

You are affected if the Frame theme version is 2.4.0 or lower AND PHP files using dynamic include/require with user-controlled parameters are web-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.4.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to the latest version of the Frame theme which contains proper input validation on include/require statements. If no update is available, implement strict whitelist-based validation on all user-controlled file path parameters and disable allow_url_include in PHP configuration.

Fix this in Frame Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58899 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data