CritiqueWordPress extension · Axiomthemes

CVE-2025-58923

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.17 or later.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in axiomthemes Critique critique allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Critique: from n/a through <= 1.17.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Critique WordPress theme allows attackers to include arbitrary local PHP files via unsanitized input in include/require statements. This can lead to remote code execution if the attacker can upload files or access existing sensitive files on the server.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of the Critique theme when available; implement strict allowlist-based input validation on all file inclusion parameters and disable allow_url_include in php.ini.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CritiqueWordPress extension
Affected:<= 1.17

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Critique theme version
    Locate the theme's style.css file in wp-content/themes/critique/ and find the 'Version:' header in the CSS comment block at the top. Alternatively, check version in theme functions.php.
    Affected if Version is 1.17 or lower (e.g., 1.16, 1.15, 1.0, etc.)
  2. Check for vulnerable file inclusion code
    Search the theme's PHP files (particularly in include/ or template directories) for include/require statements that use unsanitized variables like $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST as the file path. Look for patterns such as 'include($_REQUEST["..."]' or 'require($var)' without sanitization functions.
    Affected if Unsanitized include/require calls using user-supplied input are found in the theme code
  3. Verify PHP allow_url_include setting
    Check php.ini for the 'allow_url_include' directive, or create a PHP info page (<?php phpinfo(); ?>) and search for this setting.
    Affected if allow_url_include is set to On (enabled)
  4. Assess exposure of file inclusion parameters
    If the vulnerable code uses GET parameters, review web server logs or access logs for suspicious requests with file path parameters. Manually test by attempting to include a known safe local file (e.g., /etc/passwd on Linux) using the suspected parameter.
    Affected if File inclusion parameters are directly accessible via URL without authentication

You are affected if the Critique theme version is 1.17 or lower and the vulnerable unsanitized include/require code exists in your installation, particularly if the file inclusion parameters are externally accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.17
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of the Critique theme when available; implement strict allowlist-based input validation on all file inclusion parameters and disable allow_url_include in php.ini.

Fix this in Critique Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58923 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58923 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data