CVE-2025-58924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion in Geya <= 1.15 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnauthenticated Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in Geya software versions 1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the server via path traversal in unspecified parameters without requiring any authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Geya software installation and versionLocate the Geya application on your system and determine its exact version number. This may be found in the application itself, a configuration file, an about page, or the software's metadata.Affected if The installed version is 1.15 or any version lower than 1.15 (1.0 through 1.15 are all affected).
-
Confirm the application is accessible over the networkDetermine if the Geya web interface or API is accessible remotely. Check network bindings, firewall rules, or service configurations to see if the application accepts HTTP/HTTPS requests.Affected if The application is exposed on the network and reachable by potential attackers.
-
Identify file-handling functionalityReview the application's features to locate any functionality that accepts file paths, filenames, or file-related parameters as input. This could include file viewers, download features, image handlers, or configuration loaders.Affected if The application contains any feature that accepts user-supplied file path input without known sanitization.
-
Test for path traversal in file parametersUsing your own controlled input, observe whether the application allows directory traversal sequences (such as ../ or ..\) in file path parameters. This is a verification step to confirm the vulnerability exists in your specific deployment.Affected if The application allows directory traversal characters in file path parameters and returns file contents from outside the intended directory.
You are affected if the Geya software version is 1.15 or earlier and the application exposes file path parameters that can be manipulated with directory traversal sequences without proper sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a version newer than 1.15 if available, or implement strict input validation and path sanitization to prevent directory traversal in all user-supplied file path parameters.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data