FitflexWordPress extension · Axiomthemes
CVE-2025-58930
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in axiomthemes FitFlex fitflex allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects FitFlex: from n/a through <= 1.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe FitFlex WordPress theme by axiomthemes contains a Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability where user-controlled input is used in PHP include/require statements without proper validation. An attacker could potentially read sensitive files on the server or chain this with other techniques to achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
FitflexWordPress extension
<= 1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FitFlex theme versionInspect the style.css file in wp-content/themes/fitflex/ and look for the 'Version:' header in the theme comments at the topAffected if Version number is 1.6 or lower
-
Locate PHP files handling includesSearch the theme directory (wp-content/themes/fitflex/) for PHP files containing include, require, include_once, or require_once statements that use $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST parametersAffected if Files exist that pass user input directly to include/require without sanitization
-
Identify vulnerable parameter namesExamine the include/require statements found and note which $_GET or $_REQUEST parameters are used in the file paths (e.g., ?page=template.php)Affected if User-supplied parameters are used in include/require without validation like basename() or whitelist checks
-
Test LFI vector accessIf a vulnerable parameter is identified (e.g., ?param=value), attempt to access a known file like ../../../wp-config.php through that parameterAffected if The application returns file contents or error messages revealing path traversal is possible
-
Check PHP configurationReview php.ini or use phpinfo() to verify the allow_url_include settingAffected if allow_url_include is enabled (set to 1 or On)
You are affected if FitFlex theme version is 1.6 or lower AND user-controlled parameters are used in include/require statements without proper validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade FitFlex to a patched version. Until then, ensure PHP's allow_url_include is disabled, implement strict input validation on any user-supplied parameters used in file includes, and consider Web Application Firewall rules to detect LFI attack patterns.
Fix this in Fitflex
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58930 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58930 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data