PalatioWordPress extension · Axiomthemes

CVE-2025-58931

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.6 or later.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in axiomthemes Palatio palatio allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Palatio: from n/a through <= 1.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Palatio WordPress theme (versions <= 1.6) by axiomthemes allows attackers to include arbitrary files from the server through improper control of filename parameters in PHP include/require statements. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely with low complexity and no authentication required.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of the Palatio theme. If no patch is available, implement strict input validation with whitelist-based filtering on all file inclusion parameters and review PHP configuration settings (disable allow_url_include).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PalatioWordPress extension
Affected:<= 1.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Palatio theme installation
    Check your WordPress theme directory (wp-content/themes/palatio) for the existence of the theme. Locate the style.css or theme.json file and read the Version header to determine the installed version number.
    Affected if The theme is present and the version number is 1.6 or lower.
  2. Locate PHP include/require statements
    Search the theme's PHP files for include, include_once, require, or require_once statements that concatenate or insert variable parameters into file paths. Common search patterns: 'include($', 'require($', 'include_once($', 'require_once($'.
    Affected if File inclusion statements use unsanitized variables (e.g., $_GET, $_POST, or other user-controlled input) to construct file paths without validation.
  3. Inspect file path parameter handling
    For each identified include/require statement using variables, examine how those variables are populated. Determine whether the code uses basename(), realpath(), or whitelist validation before including files.
    Affected if Parameters passed to include/require are not validated with basename(), path traversal protections, or a whitelist of allowed files.
  4. Test for directory traversal capability
    If user-controlled parameters reach include/require statements without proper sanitization, review whether the application permits path traversal sequences like '../' in the input to access files outside the theme directory.
    Affected if The application allows directory traversal characters in file path parameters and those parameters directly influence include/require statements.

You are affected if the Palatio theme version is 1.6 or lower AND your installation contains include/require statements that use unsanitized user input in file paths without validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.6
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of the Palatio theme. If no patch is available, implement strict input validation with whitelist-based filtering on all file inclusion parameters and review PHP configuration settings (disable allow_url_include).

Fix this in Palatio Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58931 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data