CVE-2025-58962
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in publitio Publitio publitio allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Publitio: from n/a through <= 2.2.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Publitio versions through 2.2.1 allows attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources, potentially accessing sensitive internal services, cloud metadata, or bypassing network restrictions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Publitio installation and versionLocate the Publitio installation directory or check package.json/setup files for the installed version number. Common locations include the application root directory or the package manager used during installation.Affected if The installed version is Publitio 2.2.1 or any earlier version.
-
Find user-supplied URL input pointsReview application source code for endpoints, API routes, or configuration options that accept URLs as user input. Search for functions handling HTTP requests, URL parameters, or file import features.Affected if The application accepts URLs from users without strict validation.
-
Verify URL validation logicInspect the code handling URL inputs to determine if an allowlist-based validation mechanism exists. Check if the application validates the scheme, host, or domain before making requests.Affected if No allowlist-based URL validation is implemented, or validation can be bypassed.
-
Assess network accessibilityReview firewall rules, security groups, or network policies to determine if the server can reach internal services, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254), or restricted internal networks.Affected if The server has outbound access to internal networks or cloud metadata services.
If Publitio version 2.2.1 or lower is running and the application processes user-supplied URLs without strict allowlist validation, the environment is vulnerable to SSRF attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based URL validation for any user-supplied URLs, enforce network segmentation to prevent the application server from accessing internal resources, and disable unnecessary URL-following capabilities.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58962 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58962 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data