CVE-2025-58979
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in BerqWP BerqWP searchpro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects BerqWP: from n/a through <= 2.2.53.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in BerqWP plugin's searchpro feature allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to restricted functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm BerqWP plugin is installedCheck WordPress plugin directory for berqwp folder, or in WP-Admin go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for BerqWP, or run: wp plugin list --name=berqwpAffected if BerqWP plugin is not found on the system
-
Determine installed BerqWP versionIn WP-Admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > BerqWP and note the version number displayed, or run: wp plugin get berqwp --format=versionAffected if Version is present and below 2.2.53
-
Verify searchpro feature is activeCheck if the searchpro functionality is enabled in plugin settings under BerqWP configuration, or attempt to access a searchpro endpoint such as /?s=test&searchpro=1 and observe if the feature respondsAffected if searchpro feature is enabled and responding to requests
-
Test unauthorized access to searchpro endpointMake an unauthenticated HTTP request to the searchpro endpoint (e.g., /?s=anything&searchpro=1) and verify whether restricted data or functionality is returned without loginAffected if searchpro endpoint returns restricted content to unauthenticated users
Environment is affected if BerqWP plugin version is below 2.2.53 and the searchpro feature is enabled, allowing unauthenticated access to restricted functionality
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate BerqWP to the latest version beyond 2.2.53 which should contain a patch, or implement proper authorization checks on all searchpro endpoints and administrative functions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58979 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58979 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data