CVE-2025-58980
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in recorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS export-wp-page-to-static-html allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS: from n/a through <= 4.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS WordPress plugin (versions <= 4.1.0) allows users to access export functionality that should be restricted by access control lists, potentially enabling unauthorized export of site content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the plugin is installedCheck for the presence of the 'export-wp-page-to-static-html-css' directory in /wp-content/plugins/ on the WordPress server, or list installed plugins via wp-cli: wp plugin list --status=active --format=csvAffected if The plugin directory exists in /wp-content/plugins/ or appears in the active plugin list
-
Check the installed versionRead the main plugin file (e.g., export-wp-page-to-static-html-css.php) and look for the 'Version:' header in the plugin comment block, or run: wp plugin list --search='export-wp-page-to-static-html-css' --format=jsonAffected if The reported version number is 4.1.0 or lower (e.g., 4.1.0, 4.0.9, 3.x.x)
-
Confirm export functionality is accessibleAttempt to access the plugin export URL endpoint (typically /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=epwsthh_export or check the plugin source for registered AJAX actions) while logged in as a low-privilege user (e.g., editor, author, or subscriber), or inspect the plugin code for missing capability checks before export logicAffected if A non-administrator user can successfully trigger the export function or the plugin code lacks 'manage_options' or equivalent capability checks before executing export operations
If the plugin is installed at version 4.1.0 or below AND non-admin users can access or trigger the export functionality, the environment is affected by this authorization bypass.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to the latest version as soon as a patch is released. Until then, disable the plugin if not actively needed, and restrict plugin access to administrator accounts only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58980 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data