Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2025-59094

HIGH · 8.4 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-01-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
86/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A local privilege escalation vulnerability has been identified in the Kaba exos 9300 System management application (d9sysdef.exe). Within this application it is possible to specify an arbitrary executable as well as the weekday and start time, when the specified executable should be run with SYSTEM privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Kaba exos 9300 System management application (d9sysdef.exe) where an authenticated local user can specify an arbitrary executable path along with a weekday and start time, causing the specified executable to run with SYSTEM-level privileges. This allows a standard user to gain complete control over the affected system.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for the Kaba exos 9300 System management application. Until a patch is available, restrict physical and logical access to systems running this application and monitor for unauthorized scheduled tasks pointing to unexpected executables.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate d9sysdef.exe on the system
    Search for d9sysdef.exe in the Kaba exos 9300 installation directory, typically under Program Files or a vendor-specific path. Use: Get-ChildItem -Path "C:\" -Recurse -Filter "d9sysdef.exe" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
    Affected if The file exists on the system, indicating the vulnerable component is present
  2. Check file permissions on d9sysdef.exe
    Right-click the file, go to Properties > Security, or run: Get-Acl "path\to\d9sysdef.exe" | Select-Object Owner, AccessToString. Verify which users and groups have Write or Full Control permissions
    Affected if Non-privileged or non-administrative users have Write or Full Control permissions on the executable, allowing them to replace or modify it
  3. Inspect configuration files for d9sysdef.exe
    Look for accompanying configuration files (e.g., .cfg, .xml, .ini files) in the same directory. Check their permissions using: Get-Acl "path\to\configfile" | Select-Object AccessToString
    Affected if Configuration files are writable by non-privileged users, allowing them to specify arbitrary executables to run with SYSTEM privileges
  4. Check for scheduled tasks related to d9sysdef
    Run: Get-ScheduledTask | Where-Object {$_.TaskName -like "*d9sysdef*"} | Get-ScheduledTaskInfo. Note the user account the task runs under and its trigger schedule
    Affected if A scheduled task exists that runs d9sysdef.exe with SYSTEM or another elevated account, particularly if triggers are set for specific weekdays and times
  5. Verify version against affected ranges
    Right-click d9sysdef.exe > Properties > Details to view File Version, or run: (Get-Item "path\to\d9sysdef.exe").VersionInfo. Compare this version to any vendor-released version information for exos 9300
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the version range specified by the vendor as vulnerable

You are affected if d9sysdef.exe exists and non-privileged users can modify the executable, its configuration, or its scheduled task settings to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for the Kaba exos 9300 System management application. Until a patch is available, restrict physical and logical access to systems running this application and monitor for unauthorized scheduled tasks pointing to unexpected executables.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59094 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59094 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data