CVE-2025-59199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in Software Protection Platform (SPP) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in Microsoft's Software Protection Platform (SPP) that allows an already authorized (but low-privilege) local attacker to elevate their privileges to higher levels on the system. The vulnerability stems from inadequate validation of access rights within the SPP component, which manages Windows activation and licensing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.7919< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456< 10.0.22621.6060< 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899< 10.0.26200.6899< 10.0.17763.7919CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' from command prompt or execute 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsName, OsVersion, WindowsVersion, OsBuildNumber' in PowerShellAffected if The build number falls below the safe thresholds: 17763.7919 (Win10 1809/Server 2019), 19044.6456 (Win10 21h2), 19045.6456 (Win10 22h2), 22621.6060 (Win11 22h2), 22631.6060 (Win11 23h2), 26100.6899 (Win11 24h2), or 26200.6899 (Win11 25h2)
-
Verify Software Protection Platform service statusRun 'Get-Service sppsvc' in PowerShell or check Services.msc for the 'Software Protection' serviceAffected if The SPP service (sppsvc) is present and running on the system, which is the default state for activated Windows installations
-
Confirm current user privilege levelRun 'whoami /groups' in Command Prompt or '$env:USERNAME' in PowerShell to identify the current user accountAffected if The current user is a standard user (non-administrator) who has local access to the system, as the vulnerability exploits low-privilege authorized users gaining elevated access
-
Check for unpatched SPP executable versionLocate the SPP binary at C:\Windows\System32\sppsvc.exe, then right-click and view Properties > Details to see File Version, or run '(Get-Item C:\Windows\System32\sppsvc.exe).VersionInfo.FileVersion' in PowerShellAffected if The file version is older than the patched build numbers listed for your Windows version, indicating the patch has not been applied
A system is affected if it runs any of the vulnerable Windows versions listed AND has the SPP service enabled AND the security update for CVE-2025-59199 has not been installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.791910.0.19044.645610.0.19045.6456
Apply the Microsoft security update addressing CVE-2025-59199 to patch the access control flaw in the Software Protection Platform. Verify that standard user accounts can no longer leverage the SPP to gain elevated privileges.
Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7919 or later | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6456 or later | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6456 or later | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.6060 or later | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6060 or later | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.6899 or later | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.6899 or
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Navigate to the Microsoft Security Response Center (msrc.microsoft.com) and search for CVE-2025-59199
- Download and install the applicable security update for your Windows version from the Microsoft Update Catalog
- Restart the system after applying the update
- Verify the installation by checking the installed updates list or confirming the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data