CVE-2025-59204
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of uninitialized resource in Windows Management Services allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a use-of-uninitialized-resource vulnerability in Windows Management Services. When a variable, memory buffer, or other resource is used before being properly initialized, it may contain residual data from previous operations. An authorized local attacker can exploit this to read sensitive information from uninitialized memory that gets returned or exposed through the service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.7919< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456< 10.0.22621.6060<= 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899< 10.0.26200.6899< 10.0.17763.7919CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or execute 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsProductName, WindowsVersion, OsHardwareAbstractionLayer' in PowerShell to obtain the exact build version (e.g., 10.0.17763.x)Affected if The displayed build number is lower than the fixed version for your specific Windows release (e.g., below 10.0.17763.7919 for Windows 10 1809/Server 2019, below 10.0.19044.6456 for Windows 10 21h2, etc.)
-
Confirm Windows Management Services statusRun 'Get-Service WinRM' in PowerShell to check if the Windows Remote Management service is installed and runningAffected if The WinRM service is present and running, as this is the service component containing the vulnerable code
-
Verify Server 2019 if applicableFor Windows Server 2019 systems, run 'Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion' | Select-Object CurrentBuild, DisplayVersion' to confirm the buildAffected if The build number is below 10.0.17763.7919 on Windows Server 2019
-
Check Windows 11 version rangeRun 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify if the system is Windows 11 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, or 25h2 and obtain the specific buildAffected if The build is below 10.0.22621.6060 (22h2), below or equal to 10.0.22631.6060 (23h2), below 10.0.26100.6899 (24h2), or below 10.0.26200.6899 (25h2)
You are affected if your Windows version matches any of the listed affected products AND its build number falls below the corresponding fixed version threshold, with WinRM service enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.791910.0.19044.645610.0.19045.6456
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2025-59204 when available. Until then, limit local access to trusted, authorized users only and monitor for anomalous access patterns to Windows Management Services.
Install the appropriate monthly cumulative security update (KB) for your specific Windows version that includes the fix for CVE-2025-59204 - fixed builds: Windows 10 1809 (10.0.17763.7919+), Windows 10 21H2 (10.0.19044.6456+), Windows 10 22H2 (10.0.19045.6456+), Windows 11 22H2 (10.0.22621.6060+), W
- Identify the installed Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Open Settings > Windows Update > Check for updates
- Install all available cumulative security updates for your Windows version
- Alternatively, manually download and install the specific KB patch for your Windows version from the Microsoft Update Catalog
- Restart the system after installing the update
- Verify the update was installed successfully by checking the installed updates list or running 'winver' to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59204 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data