CVE-2025-59242
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Ancillary Function Driver (AFD.sys) allows a local authenticated attacker to escalate privileges to SYSTEM level by exploiting a memory corruption vulnerability in the kernel-mode network driver.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21161< 10.0.14393.8519< 10.0.17763.7919< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456< 10.0.22621.6060<= 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build numberOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to view the full OS build numberAffected if The build number falls below the thresholds: 10240.21161 (1507), 14393.8519 (1607), 17763.7919 (1809), 19044.6456 (21h2), 19045.6456 (22h2), 22621.6060 (11 22h2), 22631.6060 (11 23h2), or 26100.6899 (11 24h2)
-
Verify exact OS version stringRun 'winver' and note the version and build displayed in the About Windows dialog, or run 'systeminfo' and locate the OS Name and Version fieldsAffected if The displayed build is lower than the patched build for your specific Windows release
-
Check AFD.sys driver versionNavigate to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\AFD.sys, right-click, select Properties, and view the File Version detailsAffected if The driver file version is older than the version corresponding to your OS build's patched threshold (driver version typically matches OS build)
-
Confirm Windows Update patch statusOpen Settings > Windows Update > Update history and look for security updates installed after the CVE disclosure date; alternatively, run 'powershell Get-HotFix' to list installed hotfixesAffected if No security update containing the CVE-2025-59242 fix has been installed, or the installed updates predate the patch release
The system is affected if it runs any Windows 10 or 11 version with a build number lower than the patched threshold for that release, and lacks the corresponding security update.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2116110.0.14393.851910.0.17763.7919
Apply Microsoft security updates for this vulnerability; as a defense-in-depth measure, limit local administrative access and monitor for suspicious processes attempting to interact with AFD.sys.
Install the appropriate Windows Security Cumulative Update for your specific Windows version (minimum fixed builds: 10.0.10240.21161 for 1507, 10.0.14393.8519 for 1607, 10.0.17763.7919 for 1809, 10.0.19044.6456 for 21h2, 10.0.19045.6456 for 22h2, 10.0.22621.6060 for 11 22h2, >10.0.22631.6060 for 11
- Identify the Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Navigate to Windows Update Settings (Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security update
- Alternatively, manually download the specific KB update from the Microsoft Update Catalog matching your Windows version: For Windows 10 1507 use KB5055528 (build 10.0.10240.21161), for Windows 10 1607 use KB5055518 (build 10.0.14393.8519), for Windows 10 1809 use KB5055523 (build 10.0.17763.7919), for Windows 10 21h2 use KB5055519 (build 10.0.19044.6456), for Windows 10 22h2 use KB5055520 (build 1
- Restart the system after the update is installed
- Verify the update was successful by checking the installed updates list or running 'winver' to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59242 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59242 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data