CVE-2025-59282
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Inbox COM Objects allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Inbox COM Objects due to improper synchronization when accessing shared resources. An attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary code locally on the affected system by triggering the race condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21161< 10.0.14393.8519< 10.0.17763.7919< 10.0.19044.6456< 10.0.19045.6456<= 10.0.22621.6060<= 10.0.22631.6060< 10.0.26100.6899CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows 10 1507 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to 10.0.10240.21161Affected if Version is less than 10.0.10240.21161
-
Check Windows 10 1607 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to 10.0.14393.8519Affected if Version is less than 10.0.14393.8519
-
Check Windows 10 1809 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to 10.0.17763.7919Affected if Version is less than 10.0.17763.7919
-
Check Windows 10 21h2 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to 10.0.19044.6456Affected if Version is less than 10.0.19044.6456
-
Check Windows 10 22h2 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to 10.0.19045.6456Affected if Version is less than 10.0.19045.6456
-
Check Windows 11 versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to identify the build. For 22h2 compare to 10.0.22621.6060, for 23h2 compare to 10.0.22631.6060, for 24h2 compare to 10.0.26100.6899Affected if Windows 11 22h2 is <= 10.0.22621.6060, 23h2 is <= 10.0.22631.6060, or 24h2 is < 10.0.26100.6899
You are affected if your Windows version falls within any of the vulnerable build ranges listed for your Windows edition (10 or 11).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2116110.0.14393.851910.0.17763.7919
Implement proper synchronization primitives (mutexes, critical sections, or similar) around all shared resource accesses in the Inbox COM Objects to serialize concurrent access patterns.
Install the latest Windows cumulative update for your specific Windows version (10.0.10240.21161+ for Win10 1507, 10.0.14393.8519+ for Win10 1607, 10.0.17763.7919+ for Win10 1809, 10.0.19044.6456+ for Win10 21h2, 10.0.19045.6456+ for Win10 22h2, 10.0.22621.6061+ for Win11 22h2, 10.0.22631.6061+ for
- Open Windows Settings on the affected Windows system
- Navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest Windows security updates
- Ensure the update containing the fix for CVE-2025-59282 is installed - this is typically part of the monthly cumulative update
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the installed OS version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your Windows version using 'winver' command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59282 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59282 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data