DiascreenApplication · Deltaww

CVE-2025-59297

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.6.1 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Delta Electronics DIAScreen lacks proper validation of the user-supplied file. If a user opens a malicious file, an attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Delta Electronics DIAScreen contains an improper input validation vulnerability when processing user-supplied files. An attacker can craft a malicious file that, when opened by a user, allows arbitrary code execution within the context of the running process. This appears to be a file parsing/deserialization vulnerability.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches when available; until then, enforce strict policies prohibiting opening of untrusted files with DIAScreen and isolate the application in a restricted network environment.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DiascreenApplication
Affected:< 1.6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate DIAScreen installation
    Search for DIAScreen or Diascreen in Program Files, Program Files (x86), or the application's typical installation directory on the system. Check Start Menu shortcuts and desktop shortcuts for the installation path.
    Affected if DIAScreen is found installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Right-click the DIAScreen executable (e.g., DIAScreen.exe) and select Properties, then inspect the Details tab for the File Version or Product Version. Alternatively, check any About or Version dialog within the application.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.6.1 (e.g., 1.5.x, 1.0.x, etc.)
  3. Confirm file processing feature exists
    Launch DIAScreen and verify the application includes functionality to open, import, or load external files (such as project files, configuration files, or data files).
    Affected if The application supports opening user-supplied files and the version is below 1.6.1

If DIAScreen is installed and the version is below 1.6.1, the environment is vulnerable when processing untrusted files with the application.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.6.1 or later
Fixed in 1.6.1
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches when available; until then, enforce strict policies prohibiting opening of untrusted files with DIAScreen and isolate the application in a restricted network environment.

Recommended fix High confidence

DIAScreen 1.6.1

  1. Obtain DIAScreen version 1.6.1 or later from the official Delta Electronics download source (filecenter.deltaww.com or authorized distributors)
  2. Verify the integrity of the downloaded installer using checksums if provided by the vendor
  3. Back up any existing DIAScreen configurations, settings, and associated data
  4. Uninstall the current (vulnerable) version of DIAScreen
  5. Install DIAScreen version 1.6.1 or later
  6. Restore configuration and data from backup if applicable
  7. Verify the installation was successful and test that DIAScreen functions properly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Diascreen Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,120
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59297 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59297 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data