CVE-2025-59387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect MARS (Multi-Application Recovery Service). The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to execute unauthorized code or commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: MARS (Multi-Application Recovery Service) 1.2.1.1686 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in MARS (Multi-Application Recovery Service) allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries that can lead to unauthorized code or command execution on the underlying system. The vulnerability exists in the application's database interaction layer where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL statements.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if MARS is installedCheck common installation directories for MARS executables or services. On Windows, look in Program Files or use 'sc query' to list services containing 'MARS' or 'Multi-Application Recovery'. On Linux, check /opt or /usr/local for mars-related binaries.Affected if MARS software is found running on the system
-
Determine the installed MARS versionRun 'mars -v' or 'mars --version' from the installation directory, or right-click the executable and select Properties > Details to view the File Version. If MARS runs as a service, check the version via the service properties.Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.2.1.1686
-
Verify if MARS database service is network-accessibleCheck the MARS configuration file (typically mars.conf or database.config in the config directory) for 'bind-address', 'port', or 'listen' settings. Use 'netstat -an | grep <mars_port>' to confirm if the database port is listening on non-loopback interfaces.Affected if The MARS database interface listens on 0.0.0.0 or an external IP and is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Inspect database user permissionsReview the database connection configuration used by MARS. Check if the application database user has privileges beyond what is required (such as SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE only versus administrative or FILE privileges).Affected if The MARS database user has elevated privileges that could enable command execution via SQL injection
-
Review MARS logs for suspicious SQL patternsExamine MARS database logs or application logs in the logs/ directory for unusual query patterns, especially those containing SQL operators (UNION, OR, AND) or string literals that might indicate injection attempts.Affected if Logs show malformed SQL queries or patterns consistent with injection testing
A user is affected if MARS is installed with a version lower than 1.2.1.1686 and has its database interface network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade MARS to version 1.2.1.1686 or later to apply the vendor-provided patch. Until then, restrict network access to the MARS service interface and monitor for suspicious database query patterns.
MARS 1.2.1.1686 or later
- Identify the current version of QNAP MARS (Multi-Application Recovery Service) installed on the system
- If the installed version is earlier than 1.2.1.1686, download MARS version 1.2.1.1686 or later from the official QNAP website
- Apply the upgrade following QNAP's standard MARS installation procedures
- Verify the installed version is 1.2.1.1686 or later after the upgrade completes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data