Hyper Data ProtectorApplication · Qnap

CVE-2025-59389

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.2.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect Hyper Data Protector. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to execute unauthorized code or commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: Hyper Data Protector 2.2.4.1 and later

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in Hyper Data Protector allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially leading to unauthorized code execution or command execution on the underlying database system.

MitigationUpgrade to Hyper Data Protector version 2.2.4.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation and parameterized queries as interim compensating controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Hyper Data ProtectorApplication
Affected:>= 2.1.0.0226, < 2.2.4.1= 2.0.0.1115

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Hyper Data Protector installation
    Check the QNAP NAS App Center or look for Hyper Data Protector in the system applications directory. The application is typically installed via the QNAP App Center and runs as a system service.
    Affected if Application is installed on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Access the QNAP admin interface, go to App Center, find Hyper Data Protector, and note the installed version number. Alternatively, use the command line: qpkg find -n "Hyper Data Protector" or check /share/CACHEDEV1_DATA/.qpkg/HyperDataProtector/ for version files.
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is not visible in standard locations
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Check if installed version is exactly 2.0.0.1115 OR falls between 2.1.0.0226 and 2.2.4.0 (inclusive). Safe versions are 2.2.4.1 and later.
    Affected if Installed version matches 2.0.0.1115 or is >= 2.1.0.0226 but < 2.2.4.1
  4. Verify web interface accessibility
    Confirm the Hyper Data Protector web interface is accessible. The SQL injection is exploitable through the web interface. Check if ports (typically 8081 or custom-configured) are open and the service is running.
    Affected if Web interface is exposed and the vulnerable version is installed

User is affected if Hyper Data Protector is installed and the version is either 2.0.0.1115 or any version from 2.1.0.0226 through 2.2.4.0.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.2.4.1 or later
Fixed in 2.2.4.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Hyper Data Protector version 2.2.4.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input validation and parameterized queries as interim compensating controls.

Recommended fix High confidence

Hyper Data Protector 2.2.4.1 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current version of Hyper Data Protector installed on the QNAP device
  2. 2. Access the QNAP download center at www.qnap.com and locate the Hyper Data Protector software
  3. 3. Download Hyper Data Protector version 2.2.4.1 or later
  4. 4. Create a backup of any critical data protected by Hyper Data Protector before proceeding
  5. 5. Install the upgraded version 2.2.4.1 via the QNAP App Center or manual installation method
  6. 6. Verify the installation was successful and confirm the new version is 2.2.4.1 or higher

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Hyper Data Protector Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59389 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data