CVE-2025-59458
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn JetBrains Junie before 252.284.66, 251.284.66, 243.284.66, 252.284.61, 251.284.61, 243.284.61, 252.284.50, 252.284.54, 251.284.54, 251.284.50, 243.284.54, 243.284.50 code execution was possible due to improper command validation
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceJetBrains Junie contains a command injection vulnerability allowing remote code execution due to improper validation of commands before execution. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) enables attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 243.284.50>= 251.72.165, < 251.284.50>= 252.204.139, < 252.284.50CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Junie installation existsCheck for JetBrains Junie in installed programs (Windows: Registry or Programs and Features; Linux: /opt, /usr/local, or package manager listings; macOS: /Applications or Homebrew)Affected if JetBrains Junie is installed on the system
-
Locate Junie executable or version fileFind the Junie binary or version manifest file - common locations include the installation directory, ~/.junie, or where the tool was deployedAffected if Unable to locate Junie installation files
-
Determine installed Junie versionRun 'junie --version' or check the version information in the installation directoryAffected if Version command fails or returns no output
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls into any of these ranges: < 243.284.50, >= 251.72.165 AND < 251.284.50, >= 252.204.139 AND < 252.284.50Affected if Installed version matches any of the three vulnerable version ranges
-
Identify command execution usageReview Junie configuration or logs for enabled features that execute external commands, scripts, or shell operationsAffected if Command execution features are configured and Junie version is in affected range
Environment is affected if JetBrains Junie is installed with a version matching < 243.284.50, 251.72.165-251.284.50, or 252.204.139-252.284.50, particularly if command execution features are in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped243.284.50251.284.50252.284.50
Update JetBrains Junie to version 252.284.66 or later (for the 252.x branch), 251.284.66 or later (for 251.x), and 243.284.66 or later (for 243.x). Implement network segmentation and least-privilege execution contexts until patches are applied.
Upgrade to Junie version 243.284.66, 251.284.66, or 252.284.66 depending on your current version branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Junie version from the application UI or system information
- 2. Determine which version branch your current installation belongs to (243.x, 251.x, or 252.x)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official JetBrains source: 243.284.66 for the 243.x branch, 251.284.66 for the 251.x branch, or 252.284.66 for the 252.x branch
- 4. Back up any existing Junie data and configurations
- 5. Install the fixed version following standard JetBrains installation procedures
- 6. Verify the installation was successful and the application launches without errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59458 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59458 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data