CVE-2025-59472
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA denial of service vulnerability exists in Next.js versions with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled when running in minimal mode. The PPR resume endpoint accepts unauthenticated POST requests with the `Next-Resume: 1` header and processes attacker-controlled postponed state data. Two closely related vulnerabilities allow an attacker to crash the server process through memory exhaustion: 1. **Unbounded request body buffering**: The server buffers the entire POST request body into memory using `Buffer.concat()` without enforcing any size limit, allowing arbitrarily large payloads to exhaust available memory. 2. **Unbounded decompression (zipbomb)**: The resume data cache is decompressed using `inflateSync()` without limiting the decompressed output size. A small compressed payload can expand to hundreds of megabytes or gigabytes, causing memory exhaustion. Both attack vectors result in a fatal V8 out-of-memory error (`FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory`) causing the Node.js process to terminate. The zipbomb variant is particularly dangerous as it can bypass reverse proxy request size limits while still causing large memory allocation on the server. To be affected you must have an application running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configured along with the NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1 environment variable. Strongly consider upgrading to 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 to reduce risk and prevent availability issues in Next applications.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNext.js with Partial Prerendering (PPR) enabled in minimal mode has two memory exhaustion vulnerabilities: unbounded POST request body buffering via Buffer.concat() without size limits, and unbounded decompression using inflateSync() that allows zipbombs to expand dramatically. Both cause fatal V8 out-of-memory errors, crashing the Node.js process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.0.0, < 15.6.0>= 16.0.0, < 16.1.5= 15.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your Next.js versionRun `npm list next` or inspect package.json to find the installed Next.js version numberAffected if The version falls within >= 15.0.0 and < 15.6.0, equals 15.6.0, or falls within >= 16.0.0 and < 16.1.5
-
Locate your Next.js configuration fileFind next.config.js, next.config.mjs, or next.config.ts in your project rootAffected if A Next.js config file exists and the following checks can be performed
-
Verify if PPR is enabledOpen your Next.js config file and search for `ppr` under the `experimental` object, for example: `experimental: { ppr: true }` or `experimental: { ppr: '...' }`Affected if The `ppr` property is set to any value (true, 'incremental', 'by-request', or similar) in the experimental config
-
Confirm if minimal mode is configuredIn the same config file, check if ppr is set to 'minimal' or if there is an explicit minimal mode flag, for example: `experimental: { ppr: 'minimal' }`Affected if PPR is configured with 'minimal' mode or a similar minimal setting that enables the vulnerable code path
You are affected if your Next.js version is in the vulnerable range AND PPR with minimal mode is enabled in your configuration, allowing unbounded request body buffering and decompression to trigger out-of-memory crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.6.016.1.5
Upgrade to Next.js 15.6.0-canary.61 or 16.1.5 which contains fixes for both unbounded buffering and decompression vulnerabilities. Until upgraded, disable PPR/cached components or avoid running in minimal mode.
16.1.5
- 1. Identify all Next.js application instances running with `experimental.ppr: true` or `cacheComponents: true` configuration.
- 2. Ensure `NEXT_PRIVATE_MINIMAL_MODE=1` environment variable is not set in production (this is a debugging/internal flag).
- 3. If PPR is required, upgrade Next.js to version 16.1.5 (or 15.6.0-canary.61 for the 15.x line).
- 4. Update package.json dependency: `npm install [email protected]` or `yarn add [email protected]`.
- 5. Rebuild and redeploy all affected application instances.
- 6. Verify the application functions correctly after upgrade by testing PPR-enabled pages.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,432.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59472 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data