CVE-2025-59507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Speech allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Windows Speech where improper synchronization of shared resources allows an authorized local attacker to elevate privileges. The vulnerability stems from concurrent execution issues in the Windows Speech component that can be exploited to gain higher-level access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8594< 10.0.17763.8027< 10.0.19044.6575< 10.0.19045.6575< 10.0.22631.6199< 10.0.26100.7092< 10.0.26200.7092< 10.0.14393.8594CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to retrieve the installed Windows version and build numberAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: Windows 10 1607 < 10.0.14393.8594, Windows 10 1809 < 10.0.17763.8027, Windows 10 21h2 < 10.0.19044.6575, Windows 10 22h2 < 10.0.19045.6575, Windows 11 23h2 < 10.0.22631.6199, Windows 11 24h2 < 10.0.26100.7092, Windows 11 25h2 < 10.0.26200.7092, Windows S
-
Verify Windows Speech component presenceCheck for the presence of sapi.dll or Speech-related files in C:\Windows\System32\Speech or verify via PowerShell: Get-ItemProperty 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinueAffected if The Windows Speech component files exist on the system (the vulnerability applies only when this component is present)
-
Check Windows Speech service statusRun 'Get-Service -Name *Speech*' or 'sc query speech' in an elevated command prompt to list any Windows Speech-related servicesAffected if A Windows Speech service is installed and running on the system
Your system is affected if it runs a Windows version listed as vulnerable AND has the Windows Speech component installed and active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.859410.0.17763.802710.0.19044.6575
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows when available; ensure local user privileges are appropriately restricted and monitor for suspicious processes interacting with the Windows Speech service.
Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.8594 or later | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.8027 or later | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.6575 or later | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.6575 or later | Windows 11 23h2: build 10.0.22631.6199 or later | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.7092 or later |
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- Determine which Windows version and build you are running from the list: Windows 10 1607 (build 14393), Windows 10 1809 (build 17763), Windows 10 21h2 (build 19044), Windows 10 22h2 (build 19045), Windows 11 23h2 (build 22631), Windows 11 24h2 (build 26100), Windows 11 25h2 (build 26200), or Windows Server 2016 (build 14393)
- Apply the appropriate Windows Security Update that addresses CVE-2025-59507. For most systems, this will be the May 2025 Windows Update or later security patch
- Verify the update was installed successfully by checking Windows Update history or running 'winver' to confirm the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
- Restart the system as required by the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data