CVE-2025-59528
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFlowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 3.0.5, Flowise is vulnerable to remote code execution. The CustomMCP node allows users to input configuration settings for connecting to an external MCP server. This node parses the user-provided mcpServerConfig string to build the MCP server configuration. However, during this process, it executes JavaScript code without any security validation. Specifically, inside the convertToValidJSONString function, user input is directly passed to the Function() constructor, which evaluates and executes the input as JavaScript code. Since this runs with full Node.js runtime privileges, it can access dangerous modules such as child_process and fs. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CustomMCP node in Flowise 3.0.5 contains an RCE vulnerability where user-supplied mcpServerConfig input is passed directly to JavaScript's Function() constructor within the convertToValidJSONString function. This evaluates the input as executable code with full Node.js runtime privileges, allowing access to dangerous modules like child_process and fs for arbitrary command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Flowise versionRun 'flowise --version' from the command line, or inspect the package.json file in the Flowise installation directory for the version field.Affected if The version is exactly 3.0.5.
-
Locate the CustomMCP node definitionSearch the Flowise installation for files containing 'CustomMCP' or 'customMCP', typically in the nodes directory under packages/flowscribe/src/nodes/mcp or similar paths.Affected if The CustomMCP node file exists in the installation.
-
Check for flows using the CustomMCP nodeExamine Flowise's internal database or flows storage (JSON files in the flows data directory) for any saved flows that include the CustomMCP node.Affected if Any flow contains the CustomMCP node configuration.
-
Inspect CustomMCP node configurations for mcpServerConfigIf CustomMCP flows exist, examine their configuration data for the 'mcpServerConfig' field which contains the user-supplied input.Affected if The mcpServerConfig field is present in any CustomMCP configuration.
A user is affected if Flowise version 3.0.5 is running and any flow has the CustomMCP node enabled with an mcpServerConfig input present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Flowise version 3.0.6 or later. Until patched, restrict or disable the CustomMCP node to prevent unauthenticated users from supplying malicious configuration.
3.0.6
- Stop the Flowise service running version 3.0.5
- If using npm/node: Run 'npm install [email protected]' or update package.json to version 3.0.6 and run 'npm install'
- If using Docker: Update your Docker image tag to 3.0.6 (e.g., 'docker pull flowiseai/flowise:3.0.6') and recreate the container
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Flowise version at /api/v1/health or the UI
- Restart the Flowise service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59528 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59528 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data