CVE-2025-59539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Prior to version 10.1.0, when embedding information in the Biography field, even if that field is not rich-text, users could inject javascript code that would run in the context of the website and to any other user that can view the profile including administrators and/or superusers. This issue has been patched in version 10.1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDNN CMS versions prior to 10.1.0 contain a stored XSS vulnerability in the user profile Biography field. Even when the field is configured as plain text (not rich-text), the application fails to properly sanitize user input, allowing injection of malicious JavaScript that executes in the browser context of any user viewing that profile, including administrators.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.0= 10.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DNN installation versionLog into the DNN portal as Host or Administrator, navigate to Host > About or Admin > Site Settings, and locate the version number. Alternatively, open the web.config file in the website root and search for the version element in the assemblyBinding section.Affected if The installed version is less than 10.1.0 or equals exactly 10.1.0
-
Verify user profile functionality is enabledNavigate to Admin > Site Settings > User Profile Settings (or Members > Manage User Settings in older versions). Confirm that Allow Users to Create Profile is enabled and that the profile page is accessible to users.Affected if User profiles are enabled and accessible to users, making the Biography field available for input
-
Confirm Biography field exists in profile configurationGo to Admin > User Profile Settings > Profile Properties. Locate the Biography (or Bio) field in the list of defined profile properties and verify it is marked as Visible or Required.Affected if The Biography field is defined and visible in the user profile configuration
-
Check database for existing Biography contentQuery the database table storing user profile data (typically UserProfile or similar) and retrieve rows where the PropertyName column contains 'Biography' or 'Bio'. Examine the PropertyValue column for suspicious script tags or HTML elements.Affected if Any Biography field entries contain unencoded HTML or script tags that could execute in a viewer's browser
A defender is affected if their DNN installation version is below 10.1.0 (or equals 10.1.0), user profiles are enabled, and the Biography field is accessible and contains unsanitized content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.1.0
Upgrade to DNN version 10.1.0 or later which includes proper input sanitization for the Biography field.
10.1.0
- 1. Back up your DNN database and website files before upgrading
- 2. Download DNN version 10.1.0 from the official DNN website or GitHub releases page
- 3. Follow the official DNN upgrade instructions to apply version 10.1.0 to your existing installation
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the Biography field properly sanitizes input and does not execute injected JavaScript
- 5. Test that users with different roles (including administrators) can view profiles without XSS execution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,312.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data