CVE-2025-59572
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in purethemes WorkScout-Core workscout-core allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WorkScout-Core: from n/a through < 1.7.06.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCSRF vulnerability in WorkScout-Core theme allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended state-changing actions (such as modifying job listings, user settings, or administrative configurations) by tricking them into visiting malicious pages. The absence of anti-CSRF tokens on sensitive endpoints enables attackers to forge requests on behalf of legitimate users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WorkScout-Core theme and versionLocate the theme's main style.css or functions.php file and read the version declaration, or query your WordPress installation's theme list via wp-cli: wp theme list --status=activeAffected if The installed version falls within the affected version range or cannot be determined (unknown versions should be treated as potentially vulnerable)
-
Locate state-changing endpoints in the themeSearch the theme's PHP files for form handlers processing POST, PUT, or DELETE requests related to job listings, user settings, or admin configurations. Look for files in directories such as /inc/, /includes/, or /classes/ containing functions that modify database recordsAffected if Endpoints that accept state-changing requests without requiring authentication tokens are found
-
Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokensExamine the theme's form templates (often in /templates/ or /partials/ directories) and their associated PHP handlers. Search for nonce verification functions like wp_verify_nonce, check_ajax_referer, or custom token validation logicAffected if Forms that perform job listing modifications, user profile updates, or administrative actions lack nonce/token fields and server-side verification
-
Verify session cookie configurationCheck the theme's initialization files or WordPress cookie settings for session cookie definitions. Inspect HTTP response headers from the site using browser dev tools or curl -I to observe the Set-Cookie attributesAffected if Session cookies lack the SameSite attribute or have it set to None without Secure flag
-
Test for Referer/Origin header validationReview the PHP handler files for state-changing operations to see if they validate HTTP_REFERER or Origin headers before processing requestsAffected if No server-side validation of Referer or Origin headers is performed on sensitive POST requests
Your environment is affected if the WorkScout-Core theme is installed and its sensitive endpoints (job listing edits, user settings, admin actions) lack anti-CSRF token verification on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations (POST/PUT/DELETE requests), validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and set SameSite attribute on session cookies.
WorkScout-Core version 1.7.06
- Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
- Update WorkScout-Core plugin to version 1.7.06 or later
- Verify the update was successful by checking the installed version number in Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Test critical site functionality to ensure the update did not break any features
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59572 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59572 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data