Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-59576

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Stylemix MasterStudy LMS masterstudy-lms-learning-management-system allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects MasterStudy LMS: from n/a through <= 3.6.20.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in MasterStudy LMS plugin allows users to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to learning management functionality or data that should require higher privileges.

MitigationUpdate MasterStudy LMS to the latest patched version once available. Until then, review and enforce proper capability checks and role-based access controls on all sensitive endpoints within the plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm MasterStudy LMS plugin installation
    In WordPress admin, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify MasterStudy LMS is present and active
    Affected if MasterStudy LMS plugin is installed and active in WordPress
  2. Identify installed MasterStudy LMS version
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate MasterStudy LMS, and record the version number displayed
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is older than the patched release (no specific version range provided)
  3. Review WordPress user roles with MasterStudy access
    Navigate to MasterStudy LMS > Users or Roles settings and enumerate all user roles that have access to LMS functionality. Document which roles can access admin, instructor, or student features
    Affected if Roles are assigned permissions beyond their intended security level, or lower-privileged roles can access higher-privilege functionality
  4. Test sensitive endpoint access controls
    Using a lower-privileged account (e.g., student), attempt to access endpoints that should require higher privileges such as course creation, user management, or analytics pages. Record any successful unauthorized access
    Affected if Lower-privileged users can access or modify data or functionality reserved for administrators or instructors
  5. Audit capability checks on LMS functions
    Inspect MasterStudy LMS settings for role-based access control (RBAC) or capability configurations. Verify each sensitive function (course management, user data access, settings modification) has explicit capability requirements
    Affected if Missing or misconfigured capability checks are found, allowing privilege escalation

Environment is affected if MasterStudy LMS is installed and users with lower privileges can access LMS functionality or data that should require higher privileges due to missing or incorrect authorization checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update MasterStudy LMS to the latest patched version once available. Until then, review and enforce proper capability checks and role-based access controls on all sensitive endpoints within the plugin.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59576 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data