CVE-2025-59686
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKazaar 1.25.12 allows /api/v1/org-id/orders/order-id/documents calls with a modified order-id.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceKazaar 1.25.12 contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the /api/v1/org-id/orders/order-id/documents endpoint. The API does not properly validate that the authenticated user has authorization to access the specified order's documents, allowing attackers to modify the order-id parameter to access documents from other orders or organizations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Kazaar installation and versionLocate the Kazaar application and determine its installed version. Common methods include checking the application banner, version file, or using packaging tools (e.g., 'kazaar --version' or checking installed package metadata).Affected if The installed version is 1.25.12 (exact match). Note: Verify if other versions within the 1.25.x lineage are also affected based on vendor guidance.
-
Confirm API endpoint is exposedCheck if the Kazaar API is accessible externally or internally. Look for web server configurations, reverse proxy settings, or firewall rules that expose the /api/v1/* endpoint to users or attackers.Affected if The API endpoint /api/v1/org-id/orders/order-id/documents is reachable from untrusted networks or by unauthorized users.
-
Review API authentication configurationExamine the API configuration to confirm authentication is required for the /api/v1/* endpoints. Check authentication middleware, OAuth/JWT settings, or API key requirements in the configuration files.Affected if Authentication is not enforced or is improperly configured for the documents endpoint.
-
Audit authorization logic for order document accessReview the server-side code or configuration that handles authorization for the /api/v1/org-id/orders/order-id/documents endpoint. Look for code that verifies the authenticated user has permission to access the specific order's documents.Affected if No server-side check exists that validates the order belongs to the authenticated user's organization before returning document data.
A user is affected if they run Kazaar version 1.25.12 with the API endpoint exposed and without proper server-side authorization checks on the order documents endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement server-side authorization checks to verify the authenticated user has permission to access the requested order's documents before returning any data. Validate that the order belongs to the user's organization.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59686 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data