CVE-2025-59711
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Biztalk360 before 11.5. Because of mishandling of user-provided input in an upload mechanism, an authenticated attacker is able to write files outside of the destination directory and/or coerce an authentication from the service, aka Directory Traversal.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBizTalk360 before version 11.5 contains a directory traversal vulnerability in its file upload mechanism. Due to improper handling of user-supplied input, an authenticated attacker can write files to arbitrary locations on the server outside the intended upload directory, potentially leading to remote code execution or service compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.6.3963.2611CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Biztalk360 installationLook for Biztalk360 service in Windows Services, check for Biztalk360 application in IIS Manager, or locate the installation directory (commonly under C:\Program Files\Kovai\BizTalk360 or similar)Affected if Biztalk360 is installed and running
-
Identify installed versionCheck the version information in the Biztalk360 UI (typically in the About or Settings section), or look for a version file in the installation directoryAffected if The version number cannot be determined or is below 11.6.3963.2611
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected range: versions below 11.6.3963.2611 are vulnerableAffected if Installed version is less than 11.6.3963.2611
-
Verify file upload feature accessibilityCheck if the file upload functionality is available in the Biztalk360 interface (typically under Settings, Administration, or specific operational sections where file imports are permitted)Affected if The file upload feature is accessible to authenticated users
-
Confirm authentication is requiredVerify that the Biztalk360 application requires authentication (local Windows authentication or application-level login)Affected if An attacker can authenticate to access the file upload mechanism
Your environment is affected if Biztalk360 is installed with a version below 11.6.3963.2611 and the file upload feature is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.6.3963.2611
Upgrade BizTalk360 to version 11.5 or later. Additionally, implement strict input validation and canonicalization on all file upload paths to prevent path traversal attacks.
Biztalk360 version 11.6.3963.2611 or later
- 1. Identify the current Biztalk360 version by accessing the Administration or Settings section of the application
- 2. Create a full backup of the Biztalk360 database and configuration files
- 3. Download Biztalk360 version 11.6.3963.2611 or later from the official vendor portal
- 4. Stop the Biztalk360 services before beginning the upgrade
- 5. Run the installer/upgrade package for version 11.6.3963.2611
- 6. Follow the upgrade wizard prompts, ensuring database upgrade options are selected
- 7. Restart Biztalk360 services after the upgrade completes
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in the Administration section
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59711 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data