CVE-2025-59788
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in a reachable files_pdfviewer example directory in Nextcloud with versions before 22.2.10.33, 23.0.12.29, 24.0.12.28, 25.0.13.23, 26.0.13.20, 27.1.11.20, 28.0.14.11, 29.0.16.8, 30.0.17, 31.0.10, and 32.0.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a user's browser via a crafted PDF file to viewer.html. This issue is related to CVE-2024-4367, but the root cause of this Nextcloud issue is that the product exposes executable example code on a same-origin basis.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 30.0.0, < 30.0.17>= 31.0.0, < 31.0.10>= 32.0.0, < 32.0.1>= 22.0.0, < 22.2.10.33>= 23.0.0, < 23.0.12.29>= 24.0.0, < 24.0.12.28>= 25.0.0, < 25.0.13.23>= 26.0.0, < 26.0.13.20>= 27.0.0, < 27.1.11.20>= 28.0.0, < 28.0.14.11>= 29.0.0, < 29.0.16.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.2.10.3323.0.12.2924.0.12.28
Nextcloud Server 30.0.17, 31.0.10, 32.0.1, or 22.2.10.33 (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Nextcloud Server version using the web interface (Settings > Administration > Overview) or occ command: 'occ --version'
- 2. Based on your current major version line, upgrade to the corresponding fixed release: For Nextcloud 30.x: upgrade to 30.0.17; For Nextcloud 31.x: upgrade to 31.0.10; For Nextcloud 32.x: upgrade to 32.0.1; For Nextcloud 22.x: upgrade to 22.2.10.33
- 3. Before upgrading, perform a full backup of the Nextcloud data directory, database, and configuration files
- 4. Review the Nextcloud upgrade documentation for your deployment method (package manager, Docker, or manual)
- 5. Execute the upgrade following standard Nextcloud upgrade procedures, ensuring maintenance mode is enabled during the process
- 6. After upgrade, clear browser cache and verify the version number reflects the fixed release
- 7. Test the files_pdfviewer functionality to confirm the example directory is no longer accessible or has been patched
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59788 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59788 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data