CVE-2025-59810
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow information disclosure to an authenticated attacker via crafted requests
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR (both PaaS and on-premise) affecting versions 7.3 through 7.6.2. An authenticated attacker can craft specific requests to bypass access controls and disclose sensitive information that should be restricted based on the user's role or permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.3.0, < 7.5.2>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSOAR installed versionLog into FortiSOAR as an administrator and navigate to the About page (Settings > System > About) or use the API endpoint /api/info/ to retrieve the version numberAffected if The reported version falls within 7.3.0 - 7.5.1 or 7.6.0 - 7.6.2
-
Verify FortiSOAR web interface accessibilityAttempt to reach the FortiSOAR login page via HTTPS on the configured host and port (default 443)Affected if The FortiSOAR web interface is reachable from a network where potential attackers could authenticate
-
Confirm authentication is enabledCheck that local user authentication or SSO integration is active in Settings > Users & Roles > AuthenticationAffected if User authentication is enabled and valid user accounts exist in the system
-
Audit role-based access control configurationReview user roles and permissions in Settings > Users & Roles > Roles to identify if any roles permit access to sensitive modules or dataAffected if Roles with elevated permissions or access to sensitive data are assigned to non-admin users
You are affected if FortiSOAR version is 7.3.0 through 7.5.1 or 7.6.0 through 7.6.2 AND the web interface is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.27.6.3
Apply vendor-provided patches or upgrade to the latest FortiSOAR version. Additionally, audit user roles and permissions to ensure least-privilege access is enforced.
FortiSOAR 7.5.2 or later, or FortiSOAR 7.6.3 or later (depending on your target branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiSOAR version by checking the About section in the FortiSOAR UI or running the command: csadm --version
- 2. If running version 7.3.x or 7.4.x, plan migration to version 7.5.2 or later (or 7.6.3 or later)
- 3. If running version 7.5.0-7.5.1, upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.5.2 or later
- 4. If running version 7.6.0-7.6.2, upgrade to FortiSOAR version 7.6.3 or later
- 5. Before upgrading, perform a complete backup of the FortiSOAR database and configuration
- 6. Review Fortinet's upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version
- 7. Execute the upgrade following Fortinet's standard upgrade procedure for FortiSOAR
- 8. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and test that the access control vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59810 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data