SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-59814

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows malicious actors to gain unauthorized access to the Zenitel ICX500 and ICX510 Gateway Billing Admin endpoint, enabling them to read the entire contents of the Billing Admin database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Zenitel ICX500 and ICX510 Gateway contains an authentication/authorization bypass vulnerability in the Billing Admin endpoint. This allows unauthenticated or unauthorized attackers to directly access the billing database and exfiltrate all stored contents including potentially sensitive customer billing information, payment records, and administrative credentials.

MitigationImmediately restrict access to the Billing Admin endpoint by implementing proper authentication and authorization controls, or if not required, disable the endpoint. Apply any vendor-provided patches or updates for these gateway devices. Audit access logs for signs of exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product and version
    Access the gateway administration interface or check the system firmware version. This is typically found in the system information or device status page of the ICX500 or ICX510 Gateway management console.
    Affected if The device is a Zenitel ICX500 or ICX510 Gateway and the version matches the vulnerable range (unpatched versions).
  2. Verify the Billing Admin endpoint configuration
    Locate the Billing Admin endpoint configuration files or settings within the gateway administration panel. Check if the billing administrative interface is enabled and accessible.
    Affected if The Billing Admin endpoint is exposed and lacks proper authentication/authorization enforcement.
  3. Review access logs for Billing Admin activity
    Examine the gateway's access logs, web server logs, or security audit logs for any access attempts to the billing administrative interface. Look for requests to paths like /billing, /billing-admin, or similar endpoints that may indicate billing system access.
    Affected if There are unauthorized access attempts or successful accesses to the Billing Admin endpoint from unexpected IP addresses or without proper authentication records.
  4. Check for unexpected database access patterns
    Review database query logs or audit trails for the billing database. Look for unusual or unauthorized SELECT queries that may indicate exfiltration of customer billing information, payment records, or administrative credentials.
    Affected if There are unauthorized database queries or data access patterns that suggest the billing database contents may have been compromised.

A user is affected if they operate an unpatched Zenitel ICX500 or ICX510 Gateway with the Billing Admin endpoint exposed, and evidence exists of unauthorized access to billing data or the endpoint is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Immediately restrict access to the Billing Admin endpoint by implementing proper authentication and authorization controls, or if not required, disable the endpoint. Apply any vendor-provided patches or updates for these gateway devices. Audit access logs for signs of exploitation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59814 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59814 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data