CVE-2025-59827
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFlag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint in Flag Forge 2.1.0 implements insufficient authorization checks, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (such as Staff) to their own account. This Broken Access Control vulnerability enables privilege escalation by exploiting the admin-tier badge assignment functionality without actually possessing admin privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Flag Forge platform versionCheck the installed version of Flag Forge CTF platform by inspecting the application metadata, package.json, or the admin dashboard about/page. Look for version number 2.1.0 specifically.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.1.0
-
Verify /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint existsMake a GET or POST request to the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint using a tool like curl or browser DevTools. Check if the endpoint responds (even with an error) rather than returning a 404.Affected if The endpoint exists and responds to requests, indicating the vulnerable endpoint is present
-
Test access control on admin badge endpointAuthenticate as a regular non-admin user and attempt to make a POST request to /api/admin/assign-badge with a payload that assigns a high-privilege badge like 'Staff' or 'Admin' to the current user account. Observe if the request succeeds.Affected if A non-administrative authenticated user can successfully call the endpoint and assign themselves privileged badges
-
Check for unauthorized badge assignments in logsReview application logs, audit logs, or database records for badge assignment events where regular users assigned themselves Staff or administrative badges through the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint.Affected if There are records of non-admin users successfully assigning themselves high-privilege badges
You are affected if Flag Forge version 2.1.0 is installed AND the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint permits privilege escalation by allowing any authenticated user to assign themselves administrative-level badges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Flag Forge version 2.2.0 which contains the patch addressing this access control vulnerability.
2.2.0
- Back up your current Flagforge installation and database before upgrading
- Obtain Flagforge version 2.2.0 from the official GitHub repository (github.com/flagforge/flagforge or similar)
- Upgrade your Flagforge installation from version 2.1.0 to version 2.2.0 following the project's upgrade documentation
- Verify that the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint now properly enforces authorization checks
- Confirm that only users with admin privileges can assign badges, and regular users receive 403 Forbidden or similar authorization errors when attempting to access the endpoint
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59827 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59827 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data