CVE-2025-59852
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHCL DFXAnalytics is affected by an Insufficient Transport Layer Protection vulnerability where data is transmitted over the network without encryption, which could allow an attacker to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHCL DFXAnalytics transmits sensitive data over the network without encryption, allowing attackers on the same network or in transit paths to intercept, modify, or steal authentication credentials and data. This Insufficient Transport Layer Protection vulnerability affects the confidentiality, integrity, and authentication of the application's communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm HCL DFXAnalytics installationLocate DFXAnalytics in your environment by checking for the application or service running on its typical ports or installation directory.Affected if DFXAnalytics is present and running in the environment.
-
Determine installed versionCheck the installed version of HCL DFXAnalytics using the application's built-in version command, about page, or installation metadata.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.1 (e.g., 4.0.x, 3.x, etc.).
-
Verify TLS encryption is enabledInspect the network communication settings, web interface configuration, or API configuration to determine if TLS/SSL encryption is enforced for all connections.Affected if TLS encryption is not enabled, disabled, or set to allow weak protocols (below TLS 1.2).
-
Check for cleartext protocol usageReview the application configuration files or settings for any cleartext (unencrypted) protocols enabled for web interfaces, APIs, or inter-service communications.Affected if Cleartext protocols such as HTTP (non-SSL), unencrypted FTP, or legacy protocols are enabled or permitted.
You are affected if HCL DFXAnalytics version is below 4.1 AND TLS encryption is not enforced or cleartext protocols are enabled for network communications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1
Enable and enforce TLS 1.2 or higher for all network communications within DFXAnalytics, including web interfaces, APIs, and inter-service communications. Ensure valid, properly configured SSL/TLS certificates are in place and that cleartext protocols are disabled.
DFXAnalytics 4.1
- 1. Check the current installed version of HCL DFXAnalytics by accessing the application admin interface or checking the installation directory
- 2. Download HCL DFXAnalytics version 4.1 or later from the official HCL Software support portal at support.hcl-software.com
- 3. Review release notes and upgrade documentation for DFXAnalytics 4.1
- 4. Perform a full backup of the existing DFXAnalytics database and configuration files
- 5. Follow the standard upgrade procedure documented in the HCL DFXAnalytics installation guide
- 6. After upgrade, verify that all data transmission is now encrypted (e.g., using HTTPS/TLS)
- 7. Validate that the vulnerability is resolved by confirming cleartext protocols are no longer in use
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59852 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59852 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data