CVE-2025-59895
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 contain a remote denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in the configuration restore functionality. The issue is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied data during this process. An attacker could send malicious requests to alter the configuration file, causing the application to become unresponsive. In a successful scenario, the service may not recover on its own and require a complete reinstallation, as the configuration becomes corrupted and prevents the service from restarting, even manually.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA remote denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the configuration restore functionality of Sync Breeze Enterprise Server v10.4.18 and Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18. The issue stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied data during the configuration restore process, allowing attackers to send malicious requests that corrupt the configuration file. Once corrupted, the service becomes unresponsive and cannot recover, requiring a complete reinstallation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.4.18= 10.4.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of Disk Pulse or Sync BreezeCheck the product version through the application interface (Help > About) or by locating the executable file (diskpulse.exe or syncbreeze.exe) in the installation directory and viewing its properties. Alternatively, check the Windows Programs and Features list.Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.4.18 for either Flexense Diskpulse or Flexense Syncbreeze.
-
Verify the application service is runningOpen Windows Services (services.msc) and locate the Disk Pulse Enterprise or Sync Breeze Enterprise service. Check if its status shows as Running.Affected if The service is running and the version is 10.4.18, making it potentially vulnerable to remote exploitation.
-
Locate and inspect the configuration fileNavigate to the application data directory (typically C:\ProgramData\Flexense\DiskPulse\ or C:\ProgramData\Flexense\SyncBreeze\) and locate the configuration file (diskpulse.xml or syncbreeze.xml). Open it in a text editor and verify it is valid XML with expected structure.Affected if The configuration file exists, is readable, and the service is running version 10.4.18 - the corruption condition would manifest as malformed XML or missing critical sections after exploitation.
-
Review network access to the configuration restore endpointCheck if the application is listening on any network ports (use netstat -an | findstr "port_number" or check the server configuration). The configuration restore typically uses the same HTTP port as the web interface.Affected if The service is network-accessible and running version 10.4.18, meaning the configuration restore functionality could be reached by remote attackers.
A user is affected if they are running Disk Pulse Enterprise or Sync Breeze Enterprise version 10.4.18 and the service is network-accessible, allowing remote attackers to reach the configuration restore functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to the configuration restore functionality to trusted administrators only until an official patch is available. Consider implementing configuration backups and manual recovery procedures to minimize downtime if exploitation occurs.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59895 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data