Go F3Application · Filecoin

CVE-2025-59942

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.8.7 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

go-f3 versions 0.8.6 and below contain a denial-of-service vulnerability where specially crafted 'poison' messages trigger an integer overflow during signer index validation, causing the Filecoin node to panic and crash. The attacker must directly send these malicious messages to target nodes.

MitigationUpgrade go-f3 to version 0.8.7 or later to patch the integer overflow vulnerability in signer index validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Go F3Application
Affected:< 0.8.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify go-f3 version
    Run 'go-f3 version' or check the binary/build manifest to determine the installed version of the go-f3 component
    Affected if The version is 0.8.6 or below (anything less than 0.8.7)
  2. Confirm F3 subsystem is running
    Inspect the Filecoin node configuration or runtime status to verify whether the F3 (Filecoin Fault Fault) subsystem is enabled and actively running
    Affected if F3 is enabled and running - the vulnerability only triggers when processing messages through the F3 subsystem
  3. Check F3 network exposure
    Review network listener configuration to determine if the F3 message endpoint is exposed to external/untrusted network connections
    Affected if F3 accepts messages from network peers - the attacker must be able to directly send malicious 'poison' messages to target nodes

You are affected if your go-f3 version is below 0.8.7 AND the F3 subsystem is running AND is reachable by attackers who can send specially crafted messages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.8.7 or later
Fixed in 0.8.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade go-f3 to version 0.8.7 or later to patch the integer overflow vulnerability in signer index validation.

Recommended fix High confidence

go-f3 v0.8.7

  1. 1. Identify all systems running go-f3 version 0.8.6 or below
  2. 2. Stop any running go-f3 services before upgrading
  3. 3. Update the go-f3 dependency to version 0.8.7 using: go get github.com/filecoin-project/[email protected]
  4. 4. Rebuild the project with the updated dependency
  5. 5. Verify the new version is running: go-f3 version or check logs for version info
  6. 6. Restart the go-f3 service

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Go F3 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59942 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data