CVE-2025-59962
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Access of Uninitialized Pointer vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved with BGP sharding configured allows an attacker triggering indirect next-hop updates, along with timing outside the attacker's control, to cause rpd to crash and restart, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). With BGP sharding enabled, triggering route resolution of an indirect next-hop (e.g., an IGP route change over which a BGP route gets resolved), may cause rpd to crash and restart. An attacker causing continuous IGP route churn, resulting in repeated route re-resolution, will increase the likelihood of triggering this issue, leading to a potentially extended DoS condition. This issue affects: Junos OS: * all versions before 21.4R3-S6, * from 22.1 before 22.1R3-S6, * from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S3, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2; Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-EVO, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-EVO. Versions before Junos OS 21.3R1 and Junos OS Evolved 21.3R1-EVO are unaffected by this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn uninitialized pointer in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) is accessed when BGP sharding is enabled and indirect next-hop route resolution occurs (e.g., due to IGP route changes). This causes rpd to crash and restart, resulting in denial of service. Repeated IGP route churn increases the likelihood of triggering the crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2< 22.3= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos versionRun 'show version' and note the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches < 21.4, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4, or = 23.2 for Junos; or < 22.3, = 22.3, = 22.4, or = 23.2 for Junos OS Evolved
-
Verify BGP sharding is enabledRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and look for the 'sharding' or 'shade' configuration statements under BGP groupsAffected if Output contains 'sharding' or 'shade' configuration under any BGP group
-
Check for indirect next-hop routesRun 'show route resolution indirect' and 'show configuration protocols bgp | display set' to inspect next-hop resolution and IGP synchronization settingsAffected if Indirect next-hop resolution is active or BGP is configured to resolve next hops through IGP (e.g., 'resolve-via-igp' or similar)
Environment is affected if running a listed vulnerable Junos version AND BGP sharding is enabled AND indirect next-hop route resolution via IGP is in use, as this combination triggers the uninitialized pointer access in rpd.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.422.3
Upgrade to the fixed Junos OS/Junos OS Evolved versions specified in the advisory. Alternatively, if upgrade is not immediately feasible, consider disabling BGP sharding as a temporary workaround until the upgrade can be performed.
Junos OS: 21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S6, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S3, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2 (or later); Junos OS Evolved: 22.3R3-S3-EVO, 22.4R3-EVO, or 23.2R2-EVO (or later)
- 1. Identify the exact Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version currently running on the affected device using 'show version' command.
- 2. Confirm whether BGP sharding is enabled on the device using 'show bgp sharding' or reviewing the configuration under 'protocols bgp' hierarchy.
- 3. Based on the current version, determine the minimum fixed release required: For Junos OS 21.4x versions, upgrade to 21.4R3-S6 or later; For 22.1x versions, upgrade to 22.1R3-S6 or later; For 22.2x versions, upgrade to 22.2R3-S3 or later; For 22.3x versions, upgrade to 22.3R3-S3 or later; For 22.4x versions, upgrade to 22.4R3 or later; For 23.2x versions, upgrade to 23.2R2 or later.
- 4. For Junos OS Evolved: For 22.3x versions, upgrade to 22.3R3-S3-EVO or later; For 22.4x versions, upgrade to 22.4R3-EVO or later; For 23.2x versions, upgrade to 23.2R2-EVO or later.
- 5. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal (supportportal.juniper.net).
- 6. Upload the upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or via the management interface.
- 7. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name>' command.
- 8. After installation, reboot the device using 'request system reboot' command.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-59962 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-59962 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data